General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe mystery of Russia's missing wealth shows how Putin retains his power
Russia is a nuclear power. But an economic power it is not. Last year, the countrys GDP totaled around $1.6 trillion, less than that of the state of Texas. Nor is its wealth growing: Russias GDP in 2017 was smaller than it was in 2013, adjusting for price changes.
And yet theres no question of Russian president Vladimir Putins international influence. Witness his ability to hack bigger, richer countries democratic elections, or, as this weeks Helsinki summit highlighted, to cow Donald Trump. The Kremlins knack for punching above its weight when it comes to geopolitics is a reminder that wealth sometimes matter less than what you do with it.
Or, more precisely, to whom you give it. Oligarchs are an essential part of Putins power apparatus. And as a recent working paper (pdf) by economists Thomas Piketty, Gabriel Zucman, and Filip Novokmet reveals, the wealth that won their fealty came directly from the countrys reservesand, indeed, from the pockets of the Russian people.
By any reckoning, Russia should be rich. It has a bounty of natural resourcesoil and gas, obviously, but also coal, grains, seafood, and vast stores of minerals. Though it exported little under the Soviet regime, that changed rapidly after its collapse in 1991. Between 1993 and 2015, Russia exported around 10% more each year, on average, than it imported.
More
https://qz.com/1330955
FakeNoose
(32,617 posts)This is exactly what the super-rich of America want to do, divide up the financial bounty among themselves and pay no taxes to support our government. I'm sure the Russians have ways to avoid reporting income, by hiding it in foreign banks. Meanwhile they all pay tribute to Putin who allows them to get away with it. Vladimir Putin is one of the richest men in the world, with over $40 billion in privately owned properties and other assets. (Nobody knows how much he really has.) The wealth of Russia is being stolen out from under them and the people are powerless to see it or stop it from happening.
Is this how we will end up? The "oligarchs of America" are trying their best to make it happen!
dalton99a
(81,432 posts)lamsmy
(155 posts)This would be the best basis for a counter attack by Western powers on Putin. So far he has blamed Russian economic problems on the West. This needs to be turned around.
Alexey Navalny and other opposition leaders have taken brave stands against corruption but (like Clinton) their explanations are just too complicated and long winded for an apathetic audience to get excited about.
Instead focussed simple slogans spread far and wide on social media that get the average Russian thinking and asking questions.:
"Who stole Russia's wealth?"
"Where did the money go?"
"Why is Putin buddies with all these thieves?"
"If Putin is so great, why have wages declined under his rule?"
and my personal favourite: "Block party on the megayachts - they belong to all of us (Russians)!"
duforsure
(11,885 posts)To do the same thing here to rob or country with also.
LiberalArkie
(15,708 posts)FakeNoose
(32,617 posts)Obama did the right thing when he initiated sanctions against Russia. Some of their money is frozen by us, and they are desperate to get it back. Meanwhile several other EU countries have made their own Magnitsky laws and its rapidly increasing elsewhere. It's a nightmare for Putin and the oligarchs.
We're not keeping their money but we've frozen it so they can't keep stealing from their own country. Obama's motive was to punish Putin for the crap he was doing to us 7 or 8 years ago. Of course now it's WAY worse! This is Putin's reason for getting Trump into the White House, it's very obvious.
UTUSN
(70,672 posts)And my quibble applies to threads about SHITLER, every bit: I detest PUTEEN/Shitler and have to read and react to them, but pictures of their danged FACES are hardly ever relevant to the content, relevant only if depicting physical deterioration or how PUTEEN dominated a sheepish SHITLER.
So, I wish pictures of them would be as few as possible - ANYWHERE. For over two years, every single article mentioning SHITLER on websites finds it necessary to include a picture of his danged face. One time on the Politico website there were *THIRTEEN* (13) pictures of his danged mug on the home page, and the same goes anywhere.
Dear O.P., this is not personally aimed at you, I found your article excellent, just didn't want to have the picture of PUTEEN be what I see in clicking the thread. Please ignore this post of mine on a personal level!!!!!1 I hardly ever pose as a web nanny, hardly ever preach to others about their posting habits (although I have often been preached TO) .
Ilsa
(61,692 posts)and I thought it was telling. Putin's look was hard, determined, one of ownership. Trump's expression was of obsequiousness, total surrender.
Sometimes a picture can reveal what a transcript cannot.
UTUSN
(70,672 posts)That sometimes a picture is relevant to a topic, makes a point, but I'm talking about topics where the picture is gratuitous.