Is threat of a nuclear attack a "violent threat" contrary to Twitter's rules? It's debatable, right?

[Towlie]

Twitter Hateful Conduct Policy:

Examples of what we do not tolerate includes, but is not limited to behavior that harasses individuals or groups of people with:

violent threats;

Trump Tweet:

“To Iranian President Rouhani: NEVER, EVER THREATEN THE UNITED STATES AGAIN OR YOU WILL SUFFER CONSEQUENCES THE LIKES OF WHICH FEW THROUGHOUT HISTORY HAVE EVER SUFFERED BEFORE. WE ARE NO LONGER A COUNTRY THAT WILL STAND FOR YOUR DEMENTED WORDS OF VIOLENCE & DEATH. BE CAUTIOUS!” Trump tweeted.

But hey, there must be more violent things a person can threaten another person with beside a thermonuclear attack, although I can't think of any at the moment.

[xeodtech]

1. Absolutely ... He should be banned from Twitter.

[Initech]

2. No doubt about it. I've seen people banned for way less!

[duforsure]

3. With trump

This is really him threatening us with another war , and for putin to weaken us with.

[dalton99a]

4. Twitter moderator1: "But but is he really referring to a weapon of mass destruction?"

Twitter moderator2: "I don't see a threat of violence here"
Twitter moderator3: "There is no specificity"

etc. etc.

[Towlie]

5. Ah, Trump is worth $2 billion to Twitter. So much for that idea.