General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsriversedge
(69,722 posts)Roland99
(53,342 posts)triron
(21,915 posts)I don't see how that would be possible.
cbdo2007
(9,213 posts)Trump isn't on trial, Manafort is so why would they put Trump on trial here? They won't, but there will be plenty of evidence that comes out that clearly points out that Trump was involved, etc.
Mueller is so by the book, it is CRAZY...but in a good way.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Reading the initial indictment against him it was amazing how basic his fraud was. There wasn't even a good attempt at concealment.
If Manafort is used for the bigger collusion aspect, it would be as a witness, not in this setting.
PJMcK
(21,921 posts)Or rather, the link is odd. It goes to Ms. Eakin's Twitter feed and there isn't any supporting reporting for her tweet.
Did Robert Mueller make a statement in court? He never makes a public statement so where did she get this information?
Not to disparge Ms. Eakin, but the reporting is very thin and her following is rather limited. Is she considered a reliable source?
Roland99
(53,342 posts)PJMcK
(21,921 posts)Thanks!