General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWashington Post-Without the Russians, Trump wouldn't have won
I agree with Max Boot's analysis. Without Russia, trump would have lost https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/without-the-russians-trump-wouldnt-have-won/2018/07/24/f4c87894-8f6b-11e8-bcd5-9d911c784c38_story.html?utm_term=.faef1ea10879
While the intelligence agencies are silent on the impact of Russias attack, outside experts who have examined the Kremlin campaign which included stealing and sharing Democratic Party emails, spreading propaganda online and hacking state voter rolls have concluded that it did affect an extremely close election decided by fewer than 80,000 votes in three states. Clint Watts, a former FBI agent, writes in his recent book, Messing with the Enemy, that Russia absolutely influenced the U.S. presidential election, especially in Michigan and Wisconsin, where Trumps winning margin was less than 1 percent in each state.....
Little wonder that Trump said I love WikiLeaks and mentioned its revelations 164 times in the last month of the campaign. This WikiLeaks stuff is unbelievable, Trump said on Oct. 12. Eight days later, he marveled, Boy, that WikiLeaks has done a job on her, hasnt it?
Now, by contrast, Trump and his apologists pretend that the Russian intervention including the WikiLeaks revelations was no big deal. That beggars belief. Even if the Russians had failed, they still attacked our democracy. Yet they didnt fail: Trump won. Russian disinformation wasnt the only factor in the outcome and was probably less important in the end than FBI Director James B. Comeys announcement 11 days before the election that he was reopening the Clinton email investigation. But Watts concludes: Without the Russian influence effort, I believe Trump would not have even been within striking distance of Clinton on Election Day. That is the inconvenient truth the Putin Republicans wont admit.
Rhiannon12866
(205,161 posts)If they want to call that "winning." So he would have done even worse without Russian "meddling..." We need to keep this on the front pages every single day.
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)Scurrilous
(38,687 posts)Corgigal
(9,291 posts)Like that phrasing. Applicable.
Gothmog
(145,107 posts)spanone
(135,816 posts)gulliver
(13,180 posts)He still gets to be president, because there is nothing in the Constitution about how to deal with illegitimate wins.
I saw this article and was very glad Boot says what most people should be thinking. Otherwise, we are left with folks on the right constantly telling us how no one thinks the Russians handed Trump the presidency. They're whistling past the graveyard on it though, because that's exactly what happened.