Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DetlefK

(16,423 posts)
Thu Jul 26, 2018, 08:25 AM Jul 2018

I have a political riddle for you.

Imagine that Trump is gone. Heart-attack, impeached, jailed, voted out of office, whatever.

Who could the GOP run as his successor?
Who could convince the hardcore Trump-voters to vote for him, despite not being Saint Trump himself?

Old-school Republicans in the vein of Bush, McCain, Romney simply aren't evil enough to their taste.
Paul Ryan, Rand Paul, Marco Rubio, those are spineless wimps and not aggressive enough to their taste.
Who could it be?





And...

Whoever runs for President after Trump, what are the odds that Trump will dutifully nod and support him instead of sabotaging him from the sidelines with bullshit-tweets and bullshit-speeches?

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I have a political riddle for you. (Original Post) DetlefK Jul 2018 OP
The GOP has lost a bit of control. NCTraveler Jul 2018 #1
Vladimir Putin. spanone Jul 2018 #2
You don't think they'd go for Pence, Trumpy's number one sycophant? Ohiogal Jul 2018 #3
No, Pence's only purpose is as a backstop Recursion Jul 2018 #4
One from "Freedom Caucus" or Alwaysna Jul 2018 #5
Hmmmmm . . . and it's hard to get a tie around a ravenous wolverine . . . el_bryanto Jul 2018 #6
Dutifully nodding and supporting is boring. Orsino Jul 2018 #7
I thought in 2016 that Rand Paul was their best candidate underpants Jul 2018 #8
Rep. Steve King Doc_Technical Jul 2018 #9
Someone like Stephen Miller Saviolo Jul 2018 #10
 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
1. The GOP has lost a bit of control.
Thu Jul 26, 2018, 08:26 AM
Jul 2018

They don’t make the choice tho I’m sure they would favor someone in their primary.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
4. No, Pence's only purpose is as a backstop
Thu Jul 26, 2018, 08:30 AM
Jul 2018

Somebody who isn't dirty with Russia money just in case.

el_bryanto

(11,804 posts)
6. Hmmmmm . . . and it's hard to get a tie around a ravenous wolverine . . .
Thu Jul 26, 2018, 08:44 AM
Jul 2018

As for the second question, I think Trump will show himself to be the biggest crybaby the world has ever known.

Bryant

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
7. Dutifully nodding and supporting is boring.
Thu Jul 26, 2018, 08:49 AM
Jul 2018

Trump might be lazy enough for that, but his ego will drive him to tout his expertise in all things and will fuck up the race for the chosen successor.

He might not intend sabotage--and Putin will no doubt order him to stand behind a Republican nominee--but he can only break things.

underpants

(182,788 posts)
8. I thought in 2016 that Rand Paul was their best candidate
Thu Jul 26, 2018, 10:08 AM
Jul 2018

but he, along with others, got lost in the crowd of faces. They had 15-17 people running and they had to winnow it down to 10 for debates. Trump sucked all the oxygen out of the room. His weekly Monday morning phone ins to Fox & Friends made him vastly more visible to their base to the point that FoxNews couldn't put him away.

His libertarian background and his father giving him major bonafides is the type of candidate who can pull the whack jobs and the establishment together. But don't discount Ted Cruz either.

Saviolo

(3,282 posts)
10. Someone like Stephen Miller
Thu Jul 26, 2018, 10:24 AM
Jul 2018

A white nationalist white supremacist who's already in tight with the administration. Another person with fascist fantasies of power and the urge to purge anyone not like themselves.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I have a political riddle...