Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Takket

(21,560 posts)
4. The 4.1% was a furious selloff of exportable goods due to the tariffs anyway
Fri Jul 27, 2018, 06:46 PM
Jul 2018

the number is meaningless.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
5. Those numbers are not correct
Fri Jul 27, 2018, 06:51 PM
Jul 2018

For one thing, the third quarter of 2014 was higher than the second quarter of that year.

Real gross domestic product (GDP) increased 4.6 percent at an annual rate in the second quarter of 2014

https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2014/09/26/third-estimate-gdp-second-quarter-2014


Real gross domestic product (GDP) grew 5.0 percent at an annual rate in the third quarter of 2014

https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2014/12/23/third-estimate-gdp-third-quarter-2014


The third quarter of 2014 was the best showing

Make7

(8,543 posts)
6. The BEA makes revisions to past data sometimes.
Fri Jul 27, 2018, 07:19 PM
Jul 2018

The OP is using the latest numbers from the BEA. Here is a link to their most recent GDP change spreadsheet:

https://www.bea.gov/national/xls/gdpchg.xlsx

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
7. But look at this graphic from the BEA released earlier this year (2018)
Fri Jul 27, 2018, 07:27 PM
Jul 2018


It also shows Q3 2014 higher than Q2.
 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
9. Wow - is that normal?
Fri Jul 27, 2018, 07:44 PM
Jul 2018

Making revisions 4 years later?

Anyway - thanks for the info - I appreciate it!

Make7

(8,543 posts)
10. I'm not sure. I never paid close enough attention.
Fri Jul 27, 2018, 08:19 PM
Jul 2018

The procedure is to revise the initial estimate twice (at the end of each of the following two months). I wouldn't think there would be any significant new data after a year or so that would warrant further revisions, but if errors in the underlying data or changes in how they calculate something are made then the impact might stretch back years.

I am curious how far back the BEA's spreadsheets included in their advanced estimates are archived. Perhaps if I have time this weekend, I try to find enough old data to see how often numbers that are multiple years old are revised.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»4.1% Get in line!