General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums4.1% Get in line!
Obama
5.1% Q2 2014
4.9% Q3 2014
4.7% Q4 2011
4.5% Q4 2009
spanone
(135,823 posts)Crutchez_CuiBono
(7,725 posts)InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)Takket
(21,560 posts)the number is meaningless.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)For one thing, the third quarter of 2014 was higher than the second quarter of that year.
https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2014/09/26/third-estimate-gdp-second-quarter-2014
https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2014/12/23/third-estimate-gdp-third-quarter-2014
The third quarter of 2014 was the best showing
Make7
(8,543 posts)The OP is using the latest numbers from the BEA. Here is a link to their most recent GDP change spreadsheet:
https://www.bea.gov/national/xls/gdpchg.xlsx
oberliner
(58,724 posts)It also shows Q3 2014 higher than Q2.
Make7
(8,543 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)Making revisions 4 years later?
Anyway - thanks for the info - I appreciate it!
Make7
(8,543 posts)The procedure is to revise the initial estimate twice (at the end of each of the following two months). I wouldn't think there would be any significant new data after a year or so that would warrant further revisions, but if errors in the underlying data or changes in how they calculate something are made then the impact might stretch back years.
I am curious how far back the BEA's spreadsheets included in their advanced estimates are archived. Perhaps if I have time this weekend, I try to find enough old data to see how often numbers that are multiple years old are revised.