Ohh, I didn't know this about Maggie Haberman -

[RandomAccess]

@KaivanShroff

Dark irony to Maggie Haberman’s latest puff-piece about Ivanka and Jared is the doubling of nepotism in her own story. Her father has worked for NYTimes for over 4 decades. Her mother did Comms for both the Trumps & Kushners. Stunning the Times feels no need to make this clear.

9:32 PM - 28 Jul 2018

Link to tweet

[triron]

1. I have often felt suspicious side about her journalism on Trump and family.

(and Clinton).

[dixiegrrrrl]

20. It's easier get a feel of her via Twitter, since one can see a lot of her comments in a short time.

That's how I knew of her overall tone of her writing.

A lot of people on Twitter have been calling her out for this.

[montanacowboy]

2. Nepotism abounds

Anyone who believes anything she writes about dump should beware

She is that bunch's insider and we all should pretend that she is neutral?

She is another Judith Miller

She comes on the TV, the TV goes off. Screw her

[Wellstone ruled]

6. So agree,just another Judith Miller.

Seems her Mommy feeds her info . Another Stooge.

[donkeypoofed]

3. So that's why she was one of the 1st people Spanky told about running for Prez

I thought it was just cause he had respect for her. I do not have respect for her anymore,but I used to.

[octoberlib]

4. I believe that Javanka and Kelly Anne Conway leak to her

so she's got to keep them buttered up. She praised Conway on Twitter a couple months ago and I called her out on it. Is this good journalism? I don't think so. She reduced her tweeting time because she was getting attacked so much.

[bettyellen]

9. There was a Twitter thread less than a week ago showing how often she basically did PR puff

Pieces for Trunp and that how Trunp himself had to be a aspurce for some of what she was (wrongfully in the case of his net worth) “reporting”. He’d call on her often to refute his bad press, and she dutifully responds.

[MagickMuffin]

5. This should be included in ALL her bi-lines, she is soooo privileged

I would almost bet she has had dinners with these grifters!

[BSdetect]

7. simply biased and subjective.

[oasis]

8. And I thought Maggie was just a sub-par reporter. She was just

half-heartedly watering down the negative news on Trump. So lame, Maggie, sooooolame.

[spanone]

10. K&R...

[UTUSN]

11. K&R

[SunSeeker]

12. K & R for exposure.

[3Hotdogs]

13. Whatd'ya mean "puff piece?" Those two are super patriots. If it was't for them,

we'd all be speaking Russian right now.

We owe them our thanks.

[RandomAccess]

17. Please noteL those are not MY words, but

from a tweet. I provided the link to the tweet.

[Lonestarblue]

14. I never read Haberman or Maureen Dowd.

Dowd did many, many hatchet pieces on Hillary Clinton over lots of years. I remember seeing her interviewed once when she said it was nothing personal and she was just doing a job, but I don’t recall her writing such vicious pieces about any other woman.

[Pepsidog]

15. Another Judith Miller? A bit harsh IMO. Thanks for info, didn't know about her connections

[Achilleaze]

16. Maggie's fluffer-puff pieces are a disgrace

she should join CBS, where her fluffery would be appreciated.

The Times is slipping into a journalistic craphole from which it may never be able to crawl out.

[dixiegrrrrl]

21. Jennifer Rubin of WaPo is sort of like that.

The other day she stated on Twitter that Trump was involved with the mob, as if she had made a bright shining discovery, and got all sorts of NSS responses.

[dalton99a]

18. Time after time Haberman proved to be an apologist for the regime

[Paladin]

19. K&R. Haberman needs to be outed at every opportunity.

[blogslut]

22. It's all here:

https://medium.com/JamesFourM/maggie-duranty-80c8e85c5e88