General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJustifiably testy response from Mueller re: Manafort's request to delay things in DC case
Link to tweet
brush
(53,741 posts)Last edited Tue Jul 31, 2018, 03:24 PM - Edit history (1)
are not easy on the eyes.
blugbox
(951 posts)But they object to any longer delays because they've had five months to prepare and have already pushed dates back. He's basically saying quit the games and let's get on with it.
Bernardo de La Paz
(48,955 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(48,955 posts)Habibi
(3,598 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(48,955 posts)brush
(53,741 posts)Not hard to do either.
Bernardo de La Paz
(48,955 posts)Use the mouse wheel to enlarge the image. You have to hold down the control key on FireFox.
To enlarge fonts outside of images, use ctrl-+ (control-plus_sign). It is actually ctrl-= (control-equals) because you don't have to hold down the shift key, but "plus" is easier to remember.
I'm sorry, my one sentence summary on enlarging images was too terse and not complete due to limitations on the length of post title lines.
brush
(53,741 posts)Last edited Wed Aug 1, 2018, 11:12 AM - Edit history (1)
especially when they see it's not even live type. And spare
me the instructions on how to enlarge unsharp jpegs. I have a
Mac and all I have to do is hit the command key and the plus key
at the same but then who wants to bother as long, legal-
size pages don't fit on a screen without a lot of scrolling?
You just go to the next post because you know someone else will
post what happened in a couple of easily read sentences.
Bernardo de La Paz
(48,955 posts)It would be good for readability to:
1) Not artificially insert line breaks unless you are making numbered or unnumbered points. It interferes with the automated formatting that almost all devices and especially the DU forum uses. It is best to not assume that everyone has the same width screen as you do.
1b) In particular, when a person is using large fonts for readability, artificial line breaks and extra blank lines make broken lines look like very confusing paragraphs.
2) Not place a blank line between each artificially broken line.
3) Not depend on spell-check because a spelling can be incorrect in context despite being a "legal" spelling. Note the difference between "legalize" and "legalese".
brush
(53,741 posts)Last edited Wed Aug 1, 2018, 12:08 PM - Edit history (2)
docs are the opposite proportion of computer screens. Not easy
to read without a lot of scrolling, and if you're going to use jpegs
try the sharp/unsharp mask Photoshop feature to sharpen the
image for better readability.
Also, I add spacing between lines for the same reason, as graph
after graph of unleaded copy is hard on the eyes of some
readers.
Bernardo de La Paz
(48,955 posts)https://practicaltypography.com/line-spacing.html
For most text, the optimal line spacing is between 120% and 145% of the point size. Most word processors, as well as CSS {web text}, let you define line spacing as a multiple. Or you can do the mathmultiply your point size by the percentage.
If you care for your readers' readability you will stop double spacing and stop artificial line breaking. You will let the web sites (like DU) take care of it in their CSS. You will not assume that readers are reading at your font magnification or your device width.
Your double spacing reduces readability and so does your artificial line breaking.
If you care about your readers you will pay attention to the research on the issue.
Note: It's "sharpen", not "sharpened". Your double spacing is making it harder for yourself, harder for you to catch your "typos" / spelling errors.
brush
(53,741 posts)thanks for that also. But you can sharpen jpegs with that Photoshop feature.
Bernardo de La Paz
(48,955 posts)Your use of the Photoshop term is not at fault.
You wrote (before you walked it back on edit):
Do not state your assumptions about the other participant as if they are fact. It is a cheap debating technique that fails. I use Photoshop or Lightroom or GIMP or other post-processing just about daily.
Your English usage was "try the {...} feature to sharpened the image", which is not good English at all.
Your preference is not helping even you, with your own proofreading. You'd be well advised to change your "preference" based on the reality that research reveals.
brush
(53,741 posts)Last edited Wed Aug 1, 2018, 03:51 PM - Edit history (1)
about legal-sized docs being proportionally vertical and not ideal for horizontally-
oriented computer screens without a lot of scrolling, but that's okay. Also,
Photoshop is your friend for sharpening images.
We can both learn something from these exchanges.
Have a good day.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
Blue_Adept
(6,393 posts)So, appreciation to those who expanded upon it.
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,816 posts)is that delay upon delay is completely common. There is zero sense of urgency on the part of almost anyone in the system to get things accomplished in a timely manner. But boy, you should watch an attorney, or worse yet a judge, react when a flight they're taking is delayed for thirty minutes.
I wish I were clever enough to write a piece entitled If (something else) operated like the legal system.
empedocles
(15,751 posts)another is 'abuse of process'. Can be greatly abused - difficult to mount an effective attack on 'abuse of process' in court.
Bernardo de La Paz
(48,955 posts)LiberalLovinLug
(14,164 posts)Simple as that.
tblue37
(65,227 posts)about the English court system in the 19th century: Bleak House, my favorite Charles Dickens novel.