Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ffr

(22,665 posts)
Tue Jul 31, 2018, 06:49 PM Jul 2018

Panic on Team Trump: Is Robert Mueller closing in on criminal conspiracy charges?



As Rudy Giuliani spins a story no one can follow and his boss melts down on Twitter, intriguing hints emerge
<snip>

Anyone who's been following this story has known that the odds of Trump not knowing about this meeting with visiting Russians were nil. If there is now some corroboration of a "pre-strategy" meeting to discuss this matter, and that later that night Trump went out and telegraphed that he knew about it, it only adds to the suspicions. Moreover, if that meeting happened with the people Giuliani named, there is almost certainly corroboration: Manafort's former deputy, Rick Gates, is cooperating with Robert Mueller. Whether Gates can say for sure that Trump was told about the Russian meeting is unknown. But something has Giuliani and Trump jumping out of their skin.

Giuliani says that Cohen's team has been shopping this June 7 meeting to the press. But former Assistant U.S. Attorney Daniel Goldman has another theory. He believes that Manafort's lawyers have now seen Gates' testimony and have given the Trump team a heads-up:

If, as Goldman suspects, they're now privy to everything Gates has told Mueller, it would certainly explain the sense of barely contained panic we've seen these past few days. Remember, Gates remained part of the Trump team well into 2017. - Salon
20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Panic on Team Trump: Is Robert Mueller closing in on criminal conspiracy charges? (Original Post) ffr Jul 2018 OP
Dazed and Confused kentuck Jul 2018 #1
Not against Trump RandySF Jul 2018 #2
Can you provide a link to that assertion? Matt Miller has made it, but afaik, Mueller hasn't. (n/t) FreepFryer Jul 2018 #6
Mueller hasn't made anything public. dhol82 Jul 2018 #11
Didn't think so. Always question anyone putting words in the mouth of the Special Counsel. (n/t) FreepFryer Jul 2018 #12
Nope. You don't know that. triron Aug 2018 #19
That is one theory about Gates manor321 Jul 2018 #3
My theory is that every time Mueller looks in a dark corner marylandblue Jul 2018 #4
Good empedocles Jul 2018 #5
How about GoneOffShore Jul 2018 #10
I don't care. As long as it results in Trump being driven to jumping off a building Le Gaucher Jul 2018 #7
All makes perfect sense. lindysalsagal Jul 2018 #8
Who da team?!1 UTUSN Jul 2018 #9
Testimony at this trial is going to be quite limited & thus limited disclosure to Manafort lawyers. Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2018 #13
I would love to see yuiyoshida Jul 2018 #14
I think I agree that a sitting president can't be indicted Buckeyeblue Jul 2018 #15
It Would Create An Interesting Double Jeopardy Question Too ChoppinBroccoli Jul 2018 #17
Those questions are easy to answer marylandblue Aug 2018 #18
Spot on. triron Aug 2018 #20
Goldman's take makes plenty sense. oasis Jul 2018 #16

RandySF

(58,468 posts)
2. Not against Trump
Tue Jul 31, 2018, 06:58 PM
Jul 2018

Mueller doesn't believe a sitting president can be indicted. But Jared and Junior......

 

manor321

(3,344 posts)
3. That is one theory about Gates
Tue Jul 31, 2018, 06:59 PM
Jul 2018

Another possibility is that there is something on Cohen's tapes revealing the meeting. Remember, Trump's team has the same tapes.

marylandblue

(12,344 posts)
4. My theory is that every time Mueller looks in a dark corner
Tue Jul 31, 2018, 07:09 PM
Jul 2018

A bunch of rodents of the species rattus conspiritus magnus come scurrying out.

 

Le Gaucher

(1,547 posts)
7. I don't care. As long as it results in Trump being driven to jumping off a building
Tue Jul 31, 2018, 07:30 PM
Jul 2018

Let's all keep calm and hope for the best.

Bernardo de La Paz

(48,955 posts)
13. Testimony at this trial is going to be quite limited & thus limited disclosure to Manafort lawyers.
Tue Jul 31, 2018, 09:42 PM
Jul 2018

They will have received only as much as the prosecution needs to make its case. Hence nothing on Obstruction or Election Conspiracies (aka Collusion).

tRump's name will be barely mentioned, if at all, by Judge's direction (short of an order), and by prosecution guidance to witnesses. Manafort is scared that linking him to tRump would prejudice the jury against him.

yuiyoshida

(41,818 posts)
14. I would love to see
Tue Jul 31, 2018, 09:43 PM
Jul 2018

Jared Kushner, Don Jr. and Ivanka arrested and handcuffed by the FBI...Wouldn't Trump go ballistic, of course He could pardon them but that only means they are guilty... but I don't think he can pardon himself, and maybe he will be next after that, and this Disaster can change.

Buckeyeblue

(5,499 posts)
15. I think I agree that a sitting president can't be indicted
Tue Jul 31, 2018, 10:41 PM
Jul 2018

How would you carry out the indictment? Would there be a bond hearing? What would keep someone using indictment as a political trick?

I think the evidence has to be delivered to the house for an articles of impeachment vote. Then a trial would have to be held in the Senate.

Once removed from office, I believe the criminal proceedings could proceed.

ChoppinBroccoli

(3,781 posts)
17. It Would Create An Interesting Double Jeopardy Question Too
Tue Jul 31, 2018, 11:23 PM
Jul 2018

And since it's never happened before, there would be no guiding precedent. We would be in completely uncharted waters.

As a defense attorney, if a President were impeached and THEN criminal charges were filed, I would argue Double Jeopardy. It's not the strongest of arguments, but it's worth a hearing.

marylandblue

(12,344 posts)
18. Those questions are easy to answer
Wed Aug 1, 2018, 12:30 AM
Aug 2018

If a grand jury issues an indictment, you are indicted. Grand jury proceedings are secret, so it wouldn't even be a question until the indictment is actually unsealed.

No need for a bond hearing. Where would the president hide?

What would stop someone from using indictment as a political trick? Well, what stops someone from indicting you right now?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Panic on Team Trump: Is R...