Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
37 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rick Gates admits extra-marital affair...paid with money embezzled from Manafort (Original Post) brooklynite Aug 2018 OP
Not your ideal star witness. n/t PoliticAverse Aug 2018 #1
His Personal Activities Are Irrelevant LandOfHopeAndDreams Aug 2018 #2
I don't think I'd call stealing money from the defendant "irrelevant". A witness's criminal PoliticAverse Aug 2018 #6
Why believe any criminal informant? SunSeeker Aug 2018 #8
"Why believe any criminal informant?" - That's a good question. I wonder what the 12 jury members wi PoliticAverse Aug 2018 #10
Are you actually suggesting juries disregard criminal informants' testimony? SunSeeker Aug 2018 #11
Do you know what the word "ideal" means? To point out something has flaws is not to dismiss its PoliticAverse Aug 2018 #13
Well duh. Then what was the point of your post? Do YOU think he should not be believed? nt SunSeeker Aug 2018 #16
I think the corroborating testimony of less flawed witnesses and actual physical evidence... PoliticAverse Aug 2018 #22
So you won't answer the question? SunSeeker Aug 2018 #24
I didn't suggest he wouldn't be ultimately believed by the jury. And as to my opinion on his... PoliticAverse Aug 2018 #25
Ah, but you apparently heard enough to lament that he is not the "ideal witness." SunSeeker Aug 2018 #26
Which, as we all can agree, he isn't. n/t PoliticAverse Aug 2018 #28
He's the ideal witness against Manafort, being his right hand man. SunSeeker Aug 2018 #30
Why believe him now? Because of a mountain of paperwork confirming his testimony, pnwmom Aug 2018 #9
Right! With the paper he is corroborated. Without it I doubt it. Jersey Devil Aug 2018 #31
Mueller wanted to interview all the choir boys in Manafort's circle of friends tavernier Aug 2018 #12
Diogenes would have given up quickly, I think. n/t PoliticAverse Aug 2018 #14
Manafort stole the money he had, from banks, countries. No honor among thieves. notdarkyet Aug 2018 #29
No informant is. No one who flips on a perp has a clean background. SunSeeker Aug 2018 #7
I know! gratuitous Aug 2018 #18
LOL SunSeeker Aug 2018 #27
Probably difficult to get a clean Republican star witness. LiberalFighter Aug 2018 #35
That's the problem with all racketeering-like cases, if you think about it. Oneironaut Aug 2018 #36
Was that from a question from Manafort's lawyer? nt awesomerwb1 Aug 2018 #3
Yes. And CNN reports it a bit differently, janx Aug 2018 #21
"Set a crook, to catch a crook". SharonAnn Aug 2018 #4
... when you're all out of fucks to give, and you just don't want to die in prison. NightWatcher Aug 2018 #5
Post removed Post removed Aug 2018 #15
Wow. You sure are mad at Gates for doing the right thing and spilling on Manafort. SunSeeker Aug 2018 #17
I heard people saying that on Fox News at the tire store TeamPooka Aug 2018 #20
We won't know how willing Manafort is to "keep his mouth shut" until some time in the future... PoliticAverse Aug 2018 #23
darned him! H2O Man Aug 2018 #32
Just another Republican. TeamPooka Aug 2018 #19
Gates is not evidence. He corroborates the evidence. Sneederbunk Aug 2018 #33
Sammy the Bull Gravano turned on John Gotti marylandblue Aug 2018 #34
You mean the guy helping Manafort launder and steal money, was dishonest? Johonny Aug 2018 #37
 
2. His Personal Activities Are Irrelevant
Tue Aug 7, 2018, 05:05 PM
Aug 2018

He's a criminal, but the difference between him & Paul is that he was willing to come clean on everything once the picture was clear to him.

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
6. I don't think I'd call stealing money from the defendant "irrelevant". A witness's criminal
Tue Aug 7, 2018, 05:13 PM
Aug 2018

activity is certainly relevant especially when it got almost all of it to go away in exchange for his testimony
against Manafort. Personal activites are relevant when they speak to credibility/honesty. He lied to his wife,
he lied to Manafort, why believe him now?

SunSeeker

(51,557 posts)
8. Why believe any criminal informant?
Tue Aug 7, 2018, 05:17 PM
Aug 2018

You realize criminal informants are by definition criminals, right? That is why they have the goods on their fellow co-conspirators. If juries disregarded guys like this, we would have never been able to convict mob bosses, crooked CEOs, etc. Juries obviously don't disregard such testimony.

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
10. "Why believe any criminal informant?" - That's a good question. I wonder what the 12 jury members wi
Tue Aug 7, 2018, 05:21 PM
Aug 2018

be deciding about this one. We'll find out. But at least you seem to be acknowledging that criminal informants
aren't "idea star witness"es.



SunSeeker

(51,557 posts)
11. Are you actually suggesting juries disregard criminal informants' testimony?
Tue Aug 7, 2018, 05:26 PM
Aug 2018

You do realize they form the bedrock of mob convictions, right?

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
13. Do you know what the word "ideal" means? To point out something has flaws is not to dismiss its
Tue Aug 7, 2018, 05:28 PM
Aug 2018

entire value.

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
22. I think the corroborating testimony of less flawed witnesses and actual physical evidence...
Tue Aug 7, 2018, 05:45 PM
Aug 2018

will make his believability not a critical issue.

But my opinion doesn't matter ultimately, only the opinion of the 12 people on the jury does.

SunSeeker

(51,557 posts)
24. So you won't answer the question?
Tue Aug 7, 2018, 05:57 PM
Aug 2018

You suggest the jury won't believe him, but you won't answer whether or not you believe his testimony.

Odd.

Not me. I believe him. His testimony is corroberated by documentary evidence and puts color and context to the crimes that evidence reveals, so it should help the prosecution to convict.

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
25. I didn't suggest he wouldn't be ultimately believed by the jury. And as to my opinion on his...
Tue Aug 7, 2018, 06:01 PM
Aug 2018

believably, (1) I haven't heard all the testimony (nor has anyone else outside the courtroom) and more
importantly (2) It's doesn't really matter whether I believe him or not because I am not on the jury.

SunSeeker

(51,557 posts)
30. He's the ideal witness against Manafort, being his right hand man.
Tue Aug 7, 2018, 06:08 PM
Aug 2018

Your duly noted concerns notwithstanding.

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
9. Why believe him now? Because of a mountain of paperwork confirming his testimony,
Tue Aug 7, 2018, 05:19 PM
Aug 2018

with Manafort's signature all over the place; and the testimony of others, including two accountants who said Manafort hid 15 foreign bank accounts; and Tad Devine, who said Manafort paid great attention to every detail.

Jersey Devil

(9,874 posts)
31. Right! With the paper he is corroborated. Without it I doubt it.
Tue Aug 7, 2018, 06:09 PM
Aug 2018

Gates looks like a sleeze but the emails, etc. back him up.

tavernier

(12,388 posts)
12. Mueller wanted to interview all the choir boys in Manafort's circle of friends
Tue Aug 7, 2018, 05:27 PM
Aug 2018

but it turns out there weren’t any.

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
18. I know!
Tue Aug 7, 2018, 05:36 PM
Aug 2018

Why can't criminals associate with a better, more trustworthy, sort of people? All this unsavory testimony. So unseemly. Having to depend on the word of a man who stole thousands from a guy who stole millions. Distasteful.

Oneironaut

(5,495 posts)
36. That's the problem with all racketeering-like cases, if you think about it.
Tue Aug 7, 2018, 06:19 PM
Aug 2018

The star witnesses are usually criminals who “flipped.”

janx

(24,128 posts)
21. Yes. And CNN reports it a bit differently,
Tue Aug 7, 2018, 05:43 PM
Aug 2018

though it hardly makes any difference.

Gates admits to affair (but denies he embezzled money to fund it)
From CNN's Kara Scannell

In court, Rick Gates admitted to having an extramarital affair a decade ago, but disputed the contention from Manafort’s lawyer that he was embezzling money in order to fund his affair.

Manafort’s defense lawyer raised Gates’ affair by telling jurors that Gates had a “secret life,” living in London and other cities and using Manafort’s money in offshore accounts to pay for the relationships.

Gates acknowledged the affair, but he bickered with Manafort’s attorney over where the money came from, suggesting it was money from bonuses.

Downing also raised the prospect that Gates reimbursed personal expenses from the Trump inauguration. Gates said he could not recall whether he did so, but conceded it was possible.


https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/manafort-trial/h_f7f14c2ef7a6612b8250248758f30170

Response to brooklynite (Original post)

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
23. We won't know how willing Manafort is to "keep his mouth shut" until some time in the future...
Tue Aug 7, 2018, 05:57 PM
Aug 2018

like, say, after sentencing.

marylandblue

(12,344 posts)
34. Sammy the Bull Gravano turned on John Gotti
Tue Aug 7, 2018, 06:16 PM
Aug 2018

He murdered 19 people and the jury believed him. So, in comparison, yes, Gates is an almost ideal witness.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Rick Gates admits extra-m...