General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)LandOfHopeAndDreams
(872 posts)He's a criminal, but the difference between him & Paul is that he was willing to come clean on everything once the picture was clear to him.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)activity is certainly relevant especially when it got almost all of it to go away in exchange for his testimony
against Manafort. Personal activites are relevant when they speak to credibility/honesty. He lied to his wife,
he lied to Manafort, why believe him now?
SunSeeker
(51,557 posts)You realize criminal informants are by definition criminals, right? That is why they have the goods on their fellow co-conspirators. If juries disregarded guys like this, we would have never been able to convict mob bosses, crooked CEOs, etc. Juries obviously don't disregard such testimony.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)be deciding about this one. We'll find out. But at least you seem to be acknowledging that criminal informants
aren't "idea star witness"es.
SunSeeker
(51,557 posts)You do realize they form the bedrock of mob convictions, right?
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)entire value.
SunSeeker
(51,557 posts)PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)will make his believability not a critical issue.
But my opinion doesn't matter ultimately, only the opinion of the 12 people on the jury does.
SunSeeker
(51,557 posts)You suggest the jury won't believe him, but you won't answer whether or not you believe his testimony.
Odd.
Not me. I believe him. His testimony is corroberated by documentary evidence and puts color and context to the crimes that evidence reveals, so it should help the prosecution to convict.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)believably, (1) I haven't heard all the testimony (nor has anyone else outside the courtroom) and more
importantly (2) It's doesn't really matter whether I believe him or not because I am not on the jury.
SunSeeker
(51,557 posts)Got it.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)SunSeeker
(51,557 posts)Your duly noted concerns notwithstanding.
pnwmom
(108,978 posts)with Manafort's signature all over the place; and the testimony of others, including two accountants who said Manafort hid 15 foreign bank accounts; and Tad Devine, who said Manafort paid great attention to every detail.
Jersey Devil
(9,874 posts)Gates looks like a sleeze but the emails, etc. back him up.
tavernier
(12,388 posts)but it turns out there werent any.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)notdarkyet
(2,226 posts)SunSeeker
(51,557 posts)But your concern is duly noted.
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)Why can't criminals associate with a better, more trustworthy, sort of people? All this unsavory testimony. So unseemly. Having to depend on the word of a man who stole thousands from a guy who stole millions. Distasteful.
LiberalFighter
(50,928 posts)Oneironaut
(5,495 posts)The star witnesses are usually criminals who flipped.
awesomerwb1
(4,268 posts)janx
(24,128 posts)though it hardly makes any difference.
From CNN's Kara Scannell
In court, Rick Gates admitted to having an extramarital affair a decade ago, but disputed the contention from Manaforts lawyer that he was embezzling money in order to fund his affair.
Manaforts defense lawyer raised Gates affair by telling jurors that Gates had a secret life, living in London and other cities and using Manaforts money in offshore accounts to pay for the relationships.
Gates acknowledged the affair, but he bickered with Manaforts attorney over where the money came from, suggesting it was money from bonuses.
Downing also raised the prospect that Gates reimbursed personal expenses from the Trump inauguration. Gates said he could not recall whether he did so, but conceded it was possible.
https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/manafort-trial/h_f7f14c2ef7a6612b8250248758f30170
SharonAnn
(13,773 posts)NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)Nice catch, DOJ.
Response to brooklynite (Original post)
Post removed
SunSeeker
(51,557 posts)Odd.
TeamPooka
(24,226 posts)interesting that you'd say it here.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)like, say, after sentencing.
H2O Man
(73,537 posts)TeamPooka
(24,226 posts)Sneederbunk
(14,291 posts)marylandblue
(12,344 posts)He murdered 19 people and the jury believed him. So, in comparison, yes, Gates is an almost ideal witness.
Johonny
(20,851 posts)color me shocked.