I think we need to stop glamorizing the Post WWII expansion if we're going to move forward
Workers made less in real terms then than now. But there was a social hierarchy that funneled more of that money into white men's hands, made white women dependent on white men for upkeep, and kept minorities of both sexes from complaining about the situation through violence and coercion. So the people who "mattered" socially and politically were better off than now. But "workers", in the inclusive sense, were absolutely not better off than now.
Poverty was more common in the 1950s and early 1960s than it is now, or even than it was at the depth of the Great Recession. The US home ownership rate between 1950 and 1964 never broke 60% (we're freaking out because it's down to something like 64% now). We have this idea that back then a high school graduate could go get a factory job and afford a house, but that really wasn't the case except for a fairly small section of the country and even there, only for white men.
Looking back to a misremembered golden age is almost always a bad idea in politics. I don't want to return to this economy. I don't think you do either. Rather than making up fake stories about the past, we should be talking about what we want the current and future economy to look like.
= new reply since forum marked as read
