Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Atticus

(15,124 posts)
Tue Aug 21, 2018, 09:34 PM Aug 2018

FINALLY! The talking heads on the TV machine are at last saying that, with Cohen's

allocution today, the very LEGITIMACY of Individual 1's regime is called into question!

And, against this backdrop, the Republican "Parliament of Whores" is moving steadily forward on the looming confirmation of one Mr. Kavanaugh, thought to be a reliable "nothing to see here---move along!" vote should Individual 1 need another partisan friend on the SCOTUS.

This must be stopped---by whatever means necessary. If the current interpretations of the Constitution and statutes do not provide obvious remedies to address this crisis, new interpretations should be explored and statutes should be revised. The confirmation of Kavanaugh under the current circumstances would be a travesty and could only serve to reinforce the growing sentiment that "legal" and "just" are two very different concepts.

We are not "approaching a Constitutional crisis"; we are up to our eyeballs in one.

I have made similar posts before. I expect the same bored yawns that the others generated. It's my parents' fault: they taught me it is better to be right than popular.

22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
FINALLY! The talking heads on the TV machine are at last saying that, with Cohen's (Original Post) Atticus Aug 2018 OP
I'm on board w your thinking. Crutchez_CuiBono Aug 2018 #1
I'm not convinced that John Roberts will go along with jaysunb Aug 2018 #2
Thanks. "From your lips to God's ears!". nt Atticus Aug 2018 #3
has a seated SC justice ever been impeached? AlexSFCA Aug 2018 #11
Yes jaysunb Aug 2018 #12
If the Kavanaugh nomination gets to the floor of the Senate I want Schumer... brush Aug 2018 #4
That would be the Just thing to do. Cha Aug 2018 #6
I'm getting tired of posting this proglib217 Aug 2018 #14
Cohen would be asked under oath who this candidate was. Yonnie3 Aug 2018 #15
I'm well aware of that proglib217 Aug 2018 #16
Then he won't be able to testify. Yonnie3 Aug 2018 #18
Yeah, "a candidate for federal office" could mean ANY sitting president. Qutzupalotl Aug 2018 #19
So that could work? They could just form some sort of physical blockage in the Senate? Maraya1969 Aug 2018 #20
It would be symbolic to show the staunch opposition to the nominee. brush Aug 2018 #22
Thank You Talking HEADS on the tv Machine!! Cha Aug 2018 #5
Algum desse ch para mim tambm, por favor, eu vou cozinhar a pipoca. lambchopp59 Aug 2018 #10
the networks will follow any circus that brings the most viewers elmac Aug 2018 #7
+++++++++ pangaia Aug 2018 #8
You are right,, AND popular about this. THAT's for sure... pangaia Aug 2018 #9
Need to organize protests immediately. triron Aug 2018 #13
no confirmation of Kavanaugh bdamomma Aug 2018 #17
Yes. Now that is blatantly clear we have a mob boss sitting in the WH. honest.abe Aug 2018 #21

jaysunb

(11,856 posts)
2. I'm not convinced that John Roberts will go along with
Tue Aug 21, 2018, 09:46 PM
Aug 2018

the others should this reach the SCOTUS and Kavanaugh is confirmed,
And I'm also not sure that if Kavanaugh IS seated that under another Senate there won't be an attempt to impeach him for previous lies told in conformation hearings.

And, like you Atticus, you can blame my parents for instilling unwavering optimism in me.

brush

(53,778 posts)
4. If the Kavanaugh nomination gets to the floor of the Senate I want Schumer...
Tue Aug 21, 2018, 11:19 PM
Aug 2018

and all the Democrats occupying the floor of the Senate shouting: "Oh, hell no. You will not approve that orange criminal's nominee."

And I want them to refuse to budge until it is withdrawn.

 

proglib217

(88 posts)
14. I'm getting tired of posting this
Wed Aug 22, 2018, 09:33 AM
Aug 2018

And Bharara should know better!

Cohen did not state under oath that the President directed him to commit a federal crime. Cohen stated that "a candidate for federal office" so directed him, and that ain't the same thing!

Obviously, we're better off today than we were yesterday. Cohen's statement helps. But we're not there yet and won't be until Cohen states under oath in no uncertain terms that "Donald Trump" directed him to commit a federal crime.

Yonnie3

(17,441 posts)
15. Cohen would be asked under oath who this candidate was.
Wed Aug 22, 2018, 10:29 AM
Aug 2018

Problem solved and you can quit posting this.

Yonnie3

(17,441 posts)
18. Then he won't be able to testify.
Wed Aug 22, 2018, 11:40 AM
Aug 2018

If he had told the judge it was 'rump and he died, that testimony would be inadmissible because he couldn't be cross-examined.

brush

(53,778 posts)
22. It would be symbolic to show the staunch opposition to the nominee.
Wed Aug 22, 2018, 09:25 PM
Aug 2018

House members did a similar action last year. It's got plenty of press and photos of them occupying the House floor and then being removed by Capitol Police.

If the repugs want to ram the nomination thru the Dems can't really stop them without defections from repug ranks so the symbolism of the act would show Dem resistance to the public and it may turn out to be significant if down the road the orange criminal's nominees are deemed null and void because he's a fucking crook (sorry, I couldn't help myself there).

 

elmac

(4,642 posts)
7. the networks will follow any circus that brings the most viewers
Tue Aug 21, 2018, 11:37 PM
Aug 2018

that is why they wanted tRump as president and gave him more than twice the free airtime as hrc during the ge.

bdamomma

(63,849 posts)
17. no confirmation of Kavanaugh
Wed Aug 22, 2018, 11:33 AM
Aug 2018

should not take place now in light how we have a criminal squatting in the WH.

honest.abe

(8,678 posts)
21. Yes. Now that is blatantly clear we have a mob boss sitting in the WH.
Wed Aug 22, 2018, 04:22 PM
Aug 2018

It was clear to me the day he was elected.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»FINALLY! The talking hea...