Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

stopbush

(24,396 posts)
Thu Aug 23, 2018, 03:42 PM Aug 2018

Arrgh! Ali Velshi keeps misdefining what Impeachment means

He keeps saying that the House impeached Clinton but that the Senate did not vote to impeach him.

Bill Clinton was impeached. Impeachment is the bringing of charges, the same way an indictment is the bringing of charges. That’s it. Once the House votes to approve an article(s) of impeachment, the impeachment part of the process is over. Done.

The process then moves to a TRIAL in the Senate, where the president is found guilty or innocent of the charges for which he was impeached (ie: indicted).

We would never say that a person who was indicted, went to trial and was found not guilty was “not indicted by the jury.” No, they were indicted by the government and found innocent by the jury. But we continue to hear that the Senate “did not vote to impeach Clinton.”

Why people don’t get this when it comes to what impeachment is is a mystery.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Arrgh! Ali Velshi keeps m...