I think lawernce O'Donnell is right about the NYT OP ed.

[INdemo]

and its a pretty good guess and he did a very good job of objectionable reasoning?
Dan Coats? What do you think?

[LEW]

1. I agree!

Saw his real thinking in the interview with Andra Mitchell.

[RandySF]

2. Melania ;)

[jaysunb]

4. rofl !

On orders straight from Moscow.

[C_U_L8R]

3. I hope Dan Coats is not alone.

If he's right about his 'group' of adults, they need to stick together and testify before the country. It's getting urgent.

[INdemo]

7. He should travel to Indiana by way of Florida for a while

[populistdriven]

5. I still think its Elaine Chao

Last edited Wed Sep 5, 2018, 11:28 PM - Edit history (1)

You can't spell Chaos without Chao

[HumblePi]

6. Excellent job by O'Donnell

I think he made a very good case for Dan Coats. Pompeo and Pence are still runner up in my opinion.

Eta that one reason I feel strongly that it's Dan Coats is that he had been a Senator for years and still has many connections in the Senate. Perhaps he's sending them an SOS.

[Bradshaw3]

8. I tend to agree with Jennifer Rubin

She said it's someone one level down from the Cabinet, but they could be under Coats.

[7wo7rees]

9. Maybe it's a group project?

"We think you're crazy to make us write an essay telling you who we think we are.
You see us as you want to see us - in the simplest terms, in the most convenient definitions.

But what we found out is that each one of us is a racist...
...a misogynist...
...a liar...
...a bootlicker...
...and an enabler.

Does that answer your question? Sincerely yours, the Treason Club."