General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPierce: If I Didn't Know This Was All Rigged, I'd Think Brett Kavanaugh Is in Serious Trouble
Disheartening but I am proud of our Dems!
https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a23008325/brett-kavanaugh-kamala-harris-corey-booker/
If I Didn't Know This Was All Rigged, I'd Think Brett Kavanaugh Is in Serious Trouble
New documents and lines of questioning from Democratic senators have the nominee stumbling. It won't matter.
By Charles P. Pierce
Sep 6, 2018
And Senator Kamala Harris said, "Be sure about your answer, sir."
You know, if I didn't know that this whole thing is a rigged wheel, if I didn't know that all the wheels had been greased years ago, I'd think Brett Kavanaugh's nomination to the Supreme Court was making a brief stop in Harriet Miersville on its way to G. Harold Carswelltown. Now into his second day of testimony, he was flummoxed and floundering. He was nowhere near as slick as was Neil Gorsuch, whose thickly armored arrogance carried him past his obvious partisan bona fides. However, Kavanaugh is under a great deal more pressure than was Gorsuch.
Gorsuch was merely the penultimate step in the long march toward what would be an all-but-permanent conservative majority on there Supreme Court. Kavanaugh, as everybody knows, but pretends not to know, is the whole ballgame. He's probably the only reason that many Republicans have put up with the maniac in the White House. He's probably the reason that the now-famous Anonymous op-ed writer in The New York Times decided to be Anonymous instead of being a mensch and going over the side under his/her own name.
That's a lot of pressure on a guy with what seems to be a terribly erratic memory, and who looked very much as though he thought Senator Harris might melt him with a glare right there in the chair. She was after him on how much of a bag job his nomination was, and she was basing her questions on "committee/confidential" documents that he knows she has, but that she is forbidden from using in her interrogation. (More on this fictitious bit of Senate hocus-pocus in a minute.) She knew and he knew she knew and there was flopsweat on every syllable.
snip//
This confrontation escalated when Senators Cory Booker and Maizie Hirono told the committee that they intended to release other "committee/confidential" documents, including one allegedly dealing with racial profiling. Booker's announcement prompted an extended hooley in which John Cornyn, Republican of Texas, threatened Booker with disciplinary action up to and including expulsion from the Senate.
"Bring it," Booker replied, and his Democratic colleagues took his back. Richard Durbin of Illinois pronounced himself fed up with the farce of having Bill Burck, a former Bush administration lawyer who numbers among his clients Reince Priebus, Don McGahn, and Steve Bannon (!), decide which documents can be released publicly. He told Booker:
As I said, if I didn't know this whole thing wasn't a monumental bag job, I'd think Brett Kavanaugh was in a lot of trouble.
dlk
(11,574 posts)C_U_L8R
(45,013 posts)this will hang over the GOP and the Supreme Court as long as he's on the bench. And over time, all that 'confidential' material will come up... drip drip drip. If Republicans were smart (big if, i know), they'd pull this nomination before more damage is done. This is midterm gold... for us.
babylonsister
(171,079 posts)once he's confirmed. I hope this can be stopped. Hey, how about going after the scumbucket who nominated him in the first place?
AndJusticeForSome
(537 posts)They don't care because Trump is living proof that once your foot is in the door, no matter how it got there, is all that matters.
Hermit-The-Prog
(33,388 posts)With GOPer puppets on the U.S. Supreme Court, what are now voting irregularities could become standard operating procedure. Citizens United may have mutant offspring. Gerrymandering might become blessed (only if you're a Repug). DNA may be required before voter registration, unless you look a certain way.
MarcA
(2,195 posts)should become the motto of future Presidents, Congress and
Governors nationwide.
llmart
(15,545 posts)That's what we thought back in the Clarence Thomas/Anita Hill days.
Achilleaze
(15,543 posts)mcar
(42,358 posts)Guilded Lilly
(5,591 posts)KPN
(15,647 posts)grand-childrens' lives.
Consider that what transpires in this hearing can ultimately be grounds for impeachment. We can get there.
Guilded Lilly
(5,591 posts)Be lifted. I want these Republicans to be branded by history. I dont want their corruption to ever be forgotten.
Kavanaugh must not be confirmed.
I thank-you for the positive shot in the arm.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)will matter once we have a Democratic Congress.
AndJusticeForSome
(537 posts)the papers that she gleaned her info from, immediately after her 30 mins.
pazzyanne
(6,556 posts)We need to trust that Kamela Harris will do what needs to be done when the time is right. She is one smart cookie and knows how to use the "look" to her advantage. I really enjoyed watching Kavanaugh squirm during her pointed questioning.
AndJusticeForSome
(537 posts)WA-03 Democrat
(3,053 posts)Hes either covering gambler or Justice that has so much spare time coaching the Fighting Mary Chathrines and can host lots of baseball events. He is like Trump, blackmailable and corrupt.
Solly Mack
(90,778 posts)getagrip_already
(14,800 posts)It can be done. 5-4 can become 5-6. There is no constitutional limit to the number of justices, and they are over worked as it is.
olegramps
(8,200 posts)getagrip_already
(14,800 posts)Just a simple vote. Not even 2/3.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Lifetime appointment is hard-wired into Article III, Section 1.
"The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services, a Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office."
getagrip_already
(14,800 posts)If you are referring to removing lifetime appointments, then you are correct. It wasn't what I was referring to however.
olegramps
(8,200 posts)It is stated in the constitution and that would required amendment to the constitution. Not a simple matter.
getagrip_already
(14,800 posts)Are you saying that increasing the number SCOTUS Justices requires a constitutional amendment?
It doesn't.
And no, you are far from clear. You appear to be asking and answering your own question, then arguing about a completely different one.
olegramps
(8,200 posts)I will not waste any more time in either reading of responding to your posts.
Lucky Luciano
(11,258 posts)Hekate
(90,755 posts)onecent
(6,096 posts)bucolic_frolic
(43,243 posts)not in 2018, nor 2019, nor after that.
djacq
(1,634 posts)Especially after Sen Horonos document release on Roe v Wade.
LudwigPastorius
(9,164 posts)That is, endorsing the constitutionality of his decisions and advancing his fascist agenda.
And, the GOP is OK with that, as long as they get expansion of corporate power, disenfranchisement of minorities, and control of women's uteruses in the bargain.
We're screwed for, at least, the rest of my lifetime.
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,422 posts)Seems like they must have already known he'd run into some problems at his confirmation hearing, hence all of the rigging and obfuscation.
Scurrilous
(38,687 posts)flying_wahini
(6,628 posts)I think they feel like Kavanaugh will give them all cover for their many crimes.