Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWord detectives: Science may help finger opinion columnist
https://apnews.com/4f6b77364787489a9c0f9692702d8fcbWord detectives: Science may help finger opinion columnist
By SETH BORENSTEIN
WASHINGTON (AP) Language detectives say the key clues to who wrote the anonymous New York Times opinion piece slamming President Donald Trump may not be the odd and glimmering lodestar, but the itty-bitty words that people usually read right over: I, of and but.
And lodestar? That could be a red herring meant to throw sleuths off track, some experts say.
Experts use a combination of language use, statistics and computer science to help figure out who wrote documents that are anonymous or possibly plagiarized. Theyve even solved crimes and historical mysteries that way. Some call the field forensic linguistics, others call it stylometry or simply doing author attribution.
The field is suddenly at center stage after an unidentified senior administration official wrote in the Times that he or she was part of a resistance movement working from within the administration to curb Trumps most dangerous impulses.
My phone has been ringing off the hook with requests to do that analysis and I just dont have the time, says Duquesne University computer and language scientist Patrick Juola.
Robert Leonard, a Hofstra University linguistics professor who has helped solve murders by examining language, says if experts could get the right number of writing samples from officials whose identities are known, an analysis could certainly be done.
One political scientist figures there are about 50 people in the Trump administration who fit the Times description as a senior administration official and could be the author. The key would be to look at how they write, the words they use, what words they put next to each other, spelling, punctuation and even tenses, experts say.
....
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 835 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Word detectives: Science may help finger opinion columnist (Original Post)
dalton99a
Sep 2018
OP
I posted this the other day and one poster had already used the tool and got a hit
Bradshaw3
Sep 2018
#1
Bradshaw3
(7,533 posts)1. I posted this the other day and one poster had already used the tool and got a hit
The poster said they tried several candidates but the one that kept coming up positive was John Kelly. BTW, Kelly hasn't denied it yet.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100211098284
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,908 posts)2. That's how the anonymous author of
Primary Colors was outed.
It will depend on whether the author of the NYTimes piece has enough written material out there in the public domain.
It will depend on whether the author of the NYTimes piece has enough written material out there in the public domain.