General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIs Avenatti going after Kamala...again?
I asked but I doubt he'll answer.
Link to tweet
Someone called him out and he dodged.
Link to tweet
So I asked again.
Link to tweet
MontanaMama
(23,352 posts)would suggest she had something on Kavenaugh that she didnt actually have. If she did that, it would blow an immense amount of political capital that she cant risk. Anythings possible I guess but just because she doesnt grandstand like Avenatti doesnt mean she isnt packing, so to speak, right? Im curious about who he is referring to...
Wounded Bear
(58,737 posts)marylandblue
(12,344 posts)So I view as an analysis of her actions rather than an attack on her.
SHRED
(28,136 posts)marylandblue
(12,344 posts)So he can be right no matter what she actually does.
Jersey Devil
(9,875 posts)When you read all the tweets together I thought he was complimenting Harris, not attacking her.
I do not understand the tactics. If Harris has info about a meeting between Kavanaugh and Trump's lawyers, why would she keep it under wraps now instead of springing it?
marylandblue
(12,344 posts)She wants to wait until the hearing is over to release it so that he doesn't have a chance to correct the record. There is speculation that she is referring to a particular attorney that he actually knows very well, so he would look like a liar if he claimed he didn't know who she meant or where he worked.
Jersey Devil
(9,875 posts)If Harris believes that it won't change a single vote to trap Kavanaugh and make him look like a liar before the Senate confirmation vote then I could agree. A motion could be brought before the SC when there is a case before it involving Trump and Mueller asking Kavanaugh to recuse and then releasing the meeting info as the reason, forcing him to step aside.
I would think putting him on record as a liar now would be the better move, but maybe there is more that Harris knows that would change that.