Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RandySF

(59,312 posts)
Tue Sep 11, 2018, 11:49 PM Sep 2018

A federal appeals court just gave both middle fingers to Roe v. Wade

A panel of three Republican judges openly defied the Supreme Court on Monday, permitting a law that is nearly identical to the abortion restriction the justices struck down in Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt to take effect.

Just like Hellerstedt, Comprehensive Health v. Hawley concerns two restrictions on abortion. The first requires abortion clinics to comply with expensive architectural requirements, the second requires that “all doctors who perform abortions at ASCs must be ‘privileged to perform surgical procedures in at least one licensed hospital in the community.’” Again, the Supreme Court struck down a nearly identical Texas law in Hellerstedt.

In fairness, the two laws are not entirely identical. Most notably, Missouri’s law permits individual abortion clinics to see waivers from the “physical plant regulations,” and at least one such waiver has been granted for a clinic that made a “minor request.”

Judge Bobby Shepherd, a George W. Bush appointee, wrote for himself and his fellow Republican judges that the challenge to these “physical plant” requirements may need to be delayed until after a clinic first tries to obtain a waiver. There are strong legal arguments against Shepherd’s position here, but Shepherd and his two colleagues at least claim that this waiver system meaningfully distinguishes Hawley from Hellerstedt.

The same cannot be said, however, about Missouri’s law requiring abortion providers to be able to perform surgical procedures at a nearby hospital. Indeed, if anything, this provision of Missouri’s law is significantly more restrictive than Texas’. The law struck down in Hellerstedt merely required abortion doctors to “have active admitting privileges at a hospital” within 30 miles of the clinic. The Missouri law requires abortion providers to be able to perform surgeries in a nearby hospital, and it requires that hospital to be no more than “15 minutes away.”

https://thinkprogress.org/a-federal-appeals-court-just-openly-defied-the-supreme-court-to-uphold-an-anti-abortion-law-a53460afc5ef/?utm_campaign=trueAnthem:+Trending+Content&utm_content=5b988bc604d30138d80c42ea&utm_medium=trueAnthem&utm_source=twitter

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A federal appeals court just gave both middle fingers to Roe v. Wade (Original Post) RandySF Sep 2018 OP
The fucking Xians are trying to impose their theocracy. stopbush Sep 2018 #1
K & R. Glad u posted, I saw it earlier. GOTV! appalachiablue Sep 2018 #2
Is this the final appeal for this? Thx in advance uponit7771 Sep 2018 #3
It's a panel of the 8th circuit Mad_Mongol Sep 2018 #4
I'll bet they were male judges. JohnnyRingo Sep 2018 #5

Mad_Mongol

(86 posts)
4. It's a panel of the 8th circuit
Wed Sep 12, 2018, 02:36 AM
Sep 2018

The plaintiff can and will appeal to the full circuit.

I expect the full circuit to override.

JohnnyRingo

(18,653 posts)
5. I'll bet they were male judges.
Wed Sep 12, 2018, 02:55 AM
Sep 2018

Conservative men seem deeply obsessed with controlling women.
Getting pretty brave in the era of Trump. Saddens me.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A federal appeals court j...