It's not difficult to figure out

[SHRED]

Link to tweet

Link to tweet

[democratisphere]

1. Exactly.

Nailed it SHRED!

[Docreed2003]

2. Truth!

[Cha]

3. Bonzai!

[TomSlick]

4. I'll add another.

If your really good friend was falsely accused of attempted rape with you in the room, wouldn't rush to testify where ever and when ever you could that your friend is innocent? If your really good friend is accused of attempted rape with you in the room and you will not testify, the logical conclusion is you know the allegation to be true.

[SHRED]

5. True

[WillowTree]

6. One more time, with feeling.....The FBI does not have jurisdiction to investigate these allegations.

If she wants an investigation, she needs to file a complaint with the local authorities where it happened. Why isn't her attorney telling her that?

[PaulX2]

7. Wrong

Security blackmail exposure fbi job. Vetting.

[WillowTree]

10. What the heck are you talking about? "Vetting"?

Another one who doesn't know the difference between a criminal investigation and a background check?

Since what everyone's talking about is Dr. Ford's allegations, which do not involve any federal crime, I have no clue where you're getting "Security blackmail exposure".

[Wounded Bear]

8. Wrong. FBI has jurisdiction on background checks for Federal appointees...

[WillowTree]

9. There's a difference between a background check and an investigation. You didn't know that?

And the FBI has already conducted five or six background checks on Kavanaugh for the various government.positions he's held.

[Wounded Bear]

11. And they can reopen them when new intel/info comes to light...

Saying they can't is RW bullshit.

[WillowTree]

12. They don't "reopen" background checks.......

…….unless the client, in this case the White House, requests it. Again, they have no jurisdiction to "investigate" these allegations because she's not alleging any federal crime.