General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDennis Prager: "Should anyone be held responsible for crimes committed at 17?"
SupersedingHat Retweeted:FROM THE TOP GODDANG ROPE.
Link to tweet
"Should anyone be held responsible for crimes committed at 17? Prager asked Its a good question for Reynolds Wintersmith of Illinois, who was sentenced to life in prison in 1994 for selling crack when he was 17.
Link to tweet
redstatebluegirl
(12,265 posts)I totally understand why women are afraid to come forward but I assure you there are more than one.
GusBob
(7,286 posts)Way different standards
shraby
(21,946 posts)for his actions and he also needs to forget about that seat.
We don't need a sex pervert on the Supremes. They put one on and that's more than enough.
lapfog_1
(29,215 posts)and tries to use these words as his or her defense strategy.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,783 posts)should be executed even after DNA testing exonerated them. In most states people can be tried as adults if they are at least 14. And if a teenager can't be held responsible for attempted rape at 17, what about when he's 18? 19? 23? 30? Is there a sliding scale depending on age?
Brainstormy
(2,381 posts)He ran full page ads asking for the death penalty, and definitely knew their ages
NRaleighLiberal
(60,016 posts)The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,783 posts)and whose parents were judges and lawyers. But then, those kids probably were never charged in the first place, let alone convicted.
FloridaBlues
(4,008 posts)If Dr Ford reported this at the time he would be served with committing a crime
Attempted rape of minor.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,783 posts)and his dad was a lawyer and his mother was a judge. We know how those kids are treated - at the most it would have been a misdemeanor charge; the file would have been sealed because he was a minor, and probably later expunged.
Solly Mack
(90,778 posts)And had he been held accountable then, we wouldn't be talking about a sexual predator sitting on the Supreme Court now. (Maybe)
I can't help but think that a lot of the insanely ignorant comments being made are coming from people who believe rape and other forms of sexual assault are no big deal.
For whatever reasons, none of them good, they have decided that sexual assault isn't the heinous violation it actually is for the victims.
They don't care either.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,783 posts)Affluenza plus white male privilege. Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.
Solly Mack
(90,778 posts)"should" part of my comment.
He should have been held accountable. And in a better society, he would have been.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,783 posts)As an old lawyer friend of mine once said, "How much justice can you afford?"
Solly Mack
(90,778 posts)None of them fair.
Bettie
(16,117 posts)are almost never held to any standard or receive consequences for their actions. That's why they are so angry about Mueller. He has already put some rich white dudes in prison and doesn't seem to be done yet.
samnsara
(17,625 posts)...no S of Limitations in Md
Demovictory9
(32,467 posts)Solomon
(12,319 posts)"moral" matters and I couldn't believe the stunning hypocrisy. We have a saying about people like him: He thinks his shit don't stink.
Demovictory9
(32,467 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,239 posts)The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,783 posts)right after it occurred. Well-off white kid, mom's a judge, dad's a lawyer. What are the chances he'd have been charged with anything? A kid like that almost has to be an axe murderer to be charged with anything, then or now.
BumRushDaShow
(129,239 posts)Even then, you can kill 4 while drunk and get probation.
davsand
(13,421 posts)If you KILL somebody at 17 are they still dead a couple of decades later? Why, yes. YES they are. Pretty sure that family still misses them and that their loss is still painful. Violent crime is that permanent, and you can't legitimately say it isn't.
Assault and attempted rape are not crimes of momentary passion, it's about power and dominance. Always ahs been. Always will be. That isn't play, it isn't hi-jinx. It's violence and you are accountable for that shit your entire life.
Dumbass.
Laura
uponit7771
(90,347 posts)Eliot Rosewater
(31,112 posts)know why?
Al is innocent, nazi isnt
dchill
(38,512 posts)He's up for a lifetime seat on the United States Goddam Supreme Court! If you're willing to admit the idea that he did it, shouldn't you want someone who just simply DID NOT?
DBoon
(22,383 posts)Unlike BK, they are not white and not affluent
When they get out of prison, they will have a hard time getting any sort of job
They could never hope to become a supreme court justice
CanonRay
(14,111 posts)tazkcmo
(7,300 posts)Serving life sentences. I didn't bother with sentences of 10 years or more or those that paid with their life as in Treyvon Martin and Tamir Rice.
Ilsa
(61,695 posts)that what he was doing was immediately hurting her, and he didn't care. Does a 17 year old know not to beat up old ladies or push someone on crutches down the stairs? There is a certain amount of criminal activity that I believe children and minors understand.
These boys were daredevils with gambler issues that dared themselves to get caught. The victims were collateral damage for them.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)But if you are, you have carte-blanche. Don't worry! You will never see the inside of a prison.
meow2u3
(24,766 posts)Slightly longer answer: hell yeah, especially if the accused 17-year-old is a son of a rich, conservative white. In other words, we should treat these spoiled rich kids like they do women, the poor, and minorities--shabbily!!
dreamland
(964 posts)I'm sure that according to this logic, they should've been given a free pass.
GoCubsGo
(32,086 posts)you're goddamn right they should. You fuckers want to try 11- and 12-year-olds as adults for a lot less than that. All of a sudden we're supposed to look away for a 17-year-old? These people are sickening. Absolutely sickening.
pansypoo53219
(20,986 posts)roamer65
(36,745 posts)It should be investigated by the FBI and if just cause is found, the crime should be tried in Maryland court.
Grins
(7,221 posts)If you read Prager's shitty tome you would also see that he soon takes on female "empowerment", and not well.
"Empowers women"? Please.
When my wife was a waitress in her midteens, the manager of her restaurant grabbed her breasts and squeezed them on numerous occasions. She told him to buzz off, figured out how to avoid being in places where they were alone and continued going about her job. That's empowerment.
No. That's powerless submission to authority. You'd think a real Reich-wing authoritarian would have known that.
In translation: Dennis Prager would have had no problem had it been his now-wife in Christine Ford's position in 1982. When she was 15. Because she would have been empowered!
(At deadline, the 3rd Ms. Prager was not available for comment.)