General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHold Kavanaugh to his Own Standard for Bill Clinton, and Take Him Apart Piece by Painful Piece
Then, he wanted America to know every last distasteful thing the president had done. What right has the Supreme Court nominee have now to be shielded from the same treatment?
Michael Tomasky
09.25.18 5:46 PM ET
Piece by painful piece.
If you dont know those words as written by Brett Kavanaugh back in 1998, I urge you to commit them to memory in advance of Thursdays questioning.
They appeared in a memo Kavanaugh wrote to his boss, special prosecutor Kenneth Starr, on August 15, 1998. We were in the midst of the Bill Clinton-Monica Lewinsky scandal, and Starrs team was about to question Clinton in front of a grand jury.
After reflecting this evening, the memo began, I am strongly opposed to giving the President any break in the questioning regarding the details of the Lewinsky relationship
I have tried hard to bend over backwards and to be fair to him and to think of all reasonable defenses to his pattern of behavior. In the end, I am convinced that there really are none. The idea of going easy on him at the questioning is thus abhorrent to me.
The subsequent questioning of Clinton went as Kavanaugh had urged, and a month later, Starr and Kavanaugh and team issued a report that read not like something published by the U.S. Government Printing Office but by Larry Flynt. There were discussion of the presidential johnson, and of when he had and had not ejaculated. The word sex or a variation appeared in the report 581 times. The word Whitewaterthe failed land-deal the Clintons were involved in that was the original raison detre for Starrs investigationwas mentioned four times.
The 445-page, X-rated report existed in the form it did for one purpose only: To make the American people become so morally repulsed by Clintons behavior that they would rise up in fury and demand that he leave office. And this was done, as the memo reveals, at the behest of Brett Kavanaugh.
And now here we are, 20 years later. No, say conservatives, and even some lets be fair liberals. Lets not get too detailed about Kavanaughs past. All that yearbook stuff; lets not go there! Whatever he did, he doesnt deserve to have his youthful errors thrown before the public in such ghastly detail.
more
https://www.thedailybeast.com/democrats-hold-kavanaugh-to-his-own-standard-for-bill-clinton-and-take-him-apart-piece-by-painful-piece?ref=home
JHB
(37,160 posts)gordianot
(15,238 posts)As the orange shit stain likes to say; We shall see.
duforsure
(11,885 posts)And put him on the hot seat with their questioning of him . Having this without a FBI investigations reeks of corrupt partisanship for self protections from the investigations results. Corruption running wild from trump and all the gop , and they will be held accountable for what all they've done. One way or another this will badly backfire on them all, and they'll soon regret their actions. Protecting an international laughing stock , and corrupt serial liar will eventually get old fast as the voters run away in huge numbers from all they done, and as they are fully exposed for all their corruption.