Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rachel Mitchell cannot be hired without Sen. Feinstein? (Original Post) SHRED Sep 2018 OP
Worth trying. K&R. n/t rzemanfl Sep 2018 #1
Let the senators ask questions idcdu Sep 2018 #2
Heard Collins say yesterday there are 7 of them. Nt Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2018 #3
She's being hired by the committee's Rs, not DeminPennswoods Sep 2018 #4
But the above includes the ranking minority member SHRED Sep 2018 #5
Suspect this applies to joint hires, DeminPennswoods Sep 2018 #6
She's not a consultant, but hired as a 3-day Republican aide. TheBlackAdder Sep 2018 #7
The repukes lsewpershad Sep 2018 #8
I believe the middle ground is where all the profit is. LiberalArkie Sep 2018 #11
She's not a lawyer ProudLib72 Sep 2018 #15
Well, how 'bout that. calimary Sep 2018 #9
That's what I was thinking. kag Sep 2018 #10
Grassley is scum watoos Sep 2018 #12
Yes, 1-202-224-4521 saidsimplesimon Sep 2018 #13
They care nothing for rule of law. THey constantly bend or break rules. Amaryllis Sep 2018 #14

DeminPennswoods

(15,286 posts)
4. She's being hired by the committee's Rs, not
Wed Sep 26, 2018, 10:18 AM
Sep 2018

the committe itself. I'd think each party has the right to hire and fire it's own staff and pay for its own consultants, investigators, etc, if they like.

DeminPennswoods

(15,286 posts)
6. Suspect this applies to joint hires,
Wed Sep 26, 2018, 10:28 AM
Sep 2018

that is, people who work for the committee as a whole. Then it makes sense for the chairman and ranking member to agree on who's hired. For ex, if the committee wanted to administer polygraph tests and needed an expert polygrapher to give the test and interpret the results, that person would fall under the rule cited.

lsewpershad

(2,620 posts)
8. The repukes
Wed Sep 26, 2018, 11:00 AM
Sep 2018

always seem to find a way
While elite dems always seem to seek a middle ground with the help of the repukes..

calimary

(81,267 posts)
9. Well, how 'bout that.
Wed Sep 26, 2018, 11:32 AM
Sep 2018

Maybe this is just another rule that the CONS have decided they don't have to follow.

kag

(4,079 posts)
10. That's what I was thinking.
Wed Sep 26, 2018, 11:47 AM
Sep 2018

It doesn't matter what the rules are. The R's just don't give a shit. They'll break whatever rule they need to in order to get their way.

 

watoos

(7,142 posts)
12. Grassley is scum
Wed Sep 26, 2018, 12:10 PM
Sep 2018

so c'mon Jeff Flake, you are on the committee, do what is right for the country. Speak out about this corrupt process. 5 minutes a person to question someone who is up for a lifetime appointment. C'mon Flake, country over party.

saidsimplesimon

(7,888 posts)
13. Yes, 1-202-224-4521
Wed Sep 26, 2018, 12:18 PM
Sep 2018

I have only been able so far to leave a message on the "leave a comment on an issue" option. I will continue trying to reach a living human during business hours today.

Flake's AZ office, 602-840-1891, same voice recording, same options. What are they hiding from?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Rachel Mitchell cannot be...