Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDavid Corn called Mark Judge's attorney
Mark Judges Lawyer: He Wont Say Anything Until the Kavanaugh Confirmation Process Ends
After the Swetnick affidavit was released, I asked Judges attorney for Judges response and whether he would return to Washington and make himself available to any investigators who might want to examine these latest allegations against Kavanaugh.
He is denying the allegations in the Swetnick affidavit, Van Gelder replied, and not publicly talking about these matters during the pendency of the confirmation hearings. She then amended her statement to during the pendency of the confirmation process. Meaning Judge wont say anything until it can no longer have any bearing on whether Kavanaugh is confirmed.
Can you say why that is? I asked Van Gelder.
No, she said.
I took a stab at one other question: Does Mark know Julie Swetnick?
I just gave you my statement, she said.
More: https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2018/09/mark-judge-lawyer-he-wont-say-anything-until-the-kavanaugh-confirmation-process-ends/
After the Swetnick affidavit was released, I asked Judges attorney for Judges response and whether he would return to Washington and make himself available to any investigators who might want to examine these latest allegations against Kavanaugh.
He is denying the allegations in the Swetnick affidavit, Van Gelder replied, and not publicly talking about these matters during the pendency of the confirmation hearings. She then amended her statement to during the pendency of the confirmation process. Meaning Judge wont say anything until it can no longer have any bearing on whether Kavanaugh is confirmed.
Can you say why that is? I asked Van Gelder.
No, she said.
I took a stab at one other question: Does Mark know Julie Swetnick?
I just gave you my statement, she said.
More: https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2018/09/mark-judge-lawyer-he-wont-say-anything-until-the-kavanaugh-confirmation-process-ends/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 1479 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (19)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
David Corn called Mark Judge's attorney (Original Post)
MelissaB
Sep 2018
OP
dchill
(38,493 posts)1. "I just gave you my statement," she said.
She thinks this is a reality show. She should investigate the producer.
The_Counsel
(1,660 posts)2. Isn't a Response Like This the Same as Pleading the Fifth...?
...or accepting a pardon?
To my thinking, it appears to acknowledge guilt. I mean, seriously..."I won't say anything until I know it won't keep Kavanaugh off the Court?" So Judge knows he can incriminate himself, as well as Kavanaugh, so he chooses to say nothing and hide?
Am I barking up the wrong tree here or....nah?
dmr
(28,347 posts)4. No, that's how I interpret it.
Disgusting, shameful, and sickening. Literally.
librechik
(30,674 posts)3. so, jail it is!
you had your chance, girl fucker. Get ready for a real trial.
Roland99
(53,342 posts)5. Cagey, sniveling weasel
Grasswire2
(13,570 posts)6. maybe Avenatti can find a way to subpoena Judge.
I guess his client would have to file suit to get standing for that.