General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat If GOP Push Through Anyway? Once They Put Him On The Court It Is Done.
McConnell still seems determined to get Kavanono on the court. What next. They view a RW SCOTUS as road to permanent GOP government.
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,620 posts)hlthe2b
(102,276 posts)In which case, I think it would be Justice Roberts and the progressive justices pushing him out. (no fan of Roberts, but he does seem to care about SCOTUS legacy and reputation, at least to some extent)
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,620 posts)regnaD kciN
(26,044 posts)As far as I know, the only way to remove a Justice from their lifetime appointment is through impeachment by the House and conviction by the Senate. And the latter will almost certainly require at least 10-12 Republican senators to join the effort. Which, lets face it, will NEVER happen if theres the slightest chance a liberal (or even moderate) jurist might replace him. I doubt theyd even move against him if he was serving 10-20 in the state pen for sexual assault and kidnapping. Theyd probably only demand that he be given a secure video link in his cell so that he could continue to hear cases and maintain the right-wing majority.
hlthe2b
(102,276 posts)to resign. Even if impeachment had not yet been initiated.
we can do it
(12,184 posts)C_U_L8R
(45,002 posts)and the victims keeps coming?
RockRaven
(14,967 posts)it is not permanent. And we'd be back to 8 Justices.
janterry
(4,429 posts)through the house and the senate --and make it law.
regnaD kciN
(26,044 posts)...the House and Senate cant do anything. It will take a Constitutional Amendment and see the fate of the Equal Rights Amendment to get a sense of how likely that would be.
mythology
(9,527 posts)For example nothing was added to allow Roe v Wade or Brown v Board
shanny
(6,709 posts)about indicting a sitting Justice. Maybe after we get warmed up we can move on to Thomas.
regnaD kciN
(26,044 posts)After all, if he gets indicted, his attorneys could appeal it all the way to the Supreme Court, claiming that Justices cannot be indicted without first being removed through impeachment. Think hed recuse himself from that decision? May I laugh?
shanny
(6,709 posts)afaik there is NO even possible constitutional issue about indicting anybody other than the preznit--nobody's above the law, amirite?--it's a stretch (and not decided) to extend that leeway to the preznit, no way it goes further (not law, morals or ethics, only optics).
Kablooie
(18,634 posts)SCOTUS judges aren't above the law personally, are they?
shanny
(6,709 posts)"nobody" is. (in theory. kavanaugh is apparently OK with it)
leftieNanner
(15,100 posts)are a little bit of theater. He knows he might not be able to get the votes, but he's making it look like he can. When it all falls apart, he can claim that he gave it a 100% effort. And then move on to the next nominee.
I'm just hoping we can keep this shit show limping along so that there is no new SCOTUS Justice before the election.
MattBaggins
(7,904 posts)We must fight fire with fire and the next democratic president needs to play hardball and get as dirty as the repubs. They are not just playing politics with the USSC, they are playing down right filthy, dirty, mudslinging politics. When Trump is kicked out in 2020, the incoming president ought to day one, tell Roberts that he is being demoted to associate justice, and elevate RGB to chief justice.