Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWe still believe Anita Hill: Lessons of the backlash
From the article:
BY NOW, almost every media outlet in the country has drawn the analogy between Senate hearings for Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh and those 27 years ago for Clarence Thomas.....
For the masses of people radicalized, or re-radicalized, by #MeToo and the Womens Marches, who look back in horror to 1991 at the image of a panel of white, male senators interrogating a Black woman as if she were the one on trial, the comparisons are obvious.
Alongside this image stands the seemingly never-ending stream of stories about men of privilege who are encouraged to wield power and take whats theirs while being shielded from any sort of repercussions.
As Michelle Goldberg wrote in her examination of white, wealthy male elites like Kavanaugh in the New York Times:
Regardless of what happens to Kavanaugh, however, this scandal has given us an X-ray view of the rotten foundations of elite male power. Despite Donald Trumps populist posturing, there are few people more obsessed with Ivy League credentials. Kavanaughs nomination shows how sick the cultures that produce those credentials and thus our ruling class can be.
For the masses of people radicalized, or re-radicalized, by #MeToo and the Womens Marches, who look back in horror to 1991 at the image of a panel of white, male senators interrogating a Black woman as if she were the one on trial, the comparisons are obvious.
Alongside this image stands the seemingly never-ending stream of stories about men of privilege who are encouraged to wield power and take whats theirs while being shielded from any sort of repercussions.
As Michelle Goldberg wrote in her examination of white, wealthy male elites like Kavanaugh in the New York Times:
Regardless of what happens to Kavanaugh, however, this scandal has given us an X-ray view of the rotten foundations of elite male power. Despite Donald Trumps populist posturing, there are few people more obsessed with Ivy League credentials. Kavanaughs nomination shows how sick the cultures that produce those credentials and thus our ruling class can be.
To read more:
https://socialistworker.org/2018/09/27/we-still-believe-anita-hill-lessons-of-the-backlash
The difference is that more people are standing up today. And Grassley and the other GOP rape apologists have not realized that times have changed.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 634 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
We still believe Anita Hill: Lessons of the backlash (Original Post)
guillaumeb
Sep 2018
OP
calimary
(81,304 posts)1. We certainly do. Never wavered.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)2. Change is so slow.
The same issues that we (or me anyway) fought in the 1960s are still being fought by another generation.
calimary
(81,304 posts)5. Sigh... no shit, guillaumeb.
DeminPennswoods
(15,286 posts)3. Wasn't Dr Ford wearing a blue suit today?
It looked blue or perhaps blue-gray.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)4. I did not watch. I listened on WCPT.
The stress in her voice was evident.