General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDumb Question but What is with Ayn Rand?
Dumb question but what it is with Ayn Rand? I've seen so many threads over the past day or so here about her. I know Paul Ryan likes her and she is his favorite author and all but what is it about her that I don't know? Sorry for asking such a dumb question but other than knowing she is an author and loved by the right wing, I'm not exactly sure as to why.
Marr
(20,317 posts)while greed is good.
I've always found it odd that the right has so embraced her, while also claiming Christianity. If there's anything in the world more anti-Christ than Objectivism, I'd like to know what it is.
applegrove
(118,832 posts)Last edited Mon Aug 13, 2012, 01:09 AM - Edit history (2)
Her characters actually try to disconnect you from anything outside of yourself. Even in the selfish days childhood we were connected with others and empathized with their plight. Not so in her books. She truly tries to give birth to selfish babies in those who read her philosophy. Ryan is one.
elleng
(131,189 posts)Aristus
(66,474 posts)Extreme, ultra-right wing, free-market pornography basically. Basically stated that compassion, altruism, and empathy were signs of weakness, and that a human being's highest calling was the amassing of wealth and power at the expense of society, culture, community, family, you name it.
Reich-wingers love her for that, naturally, and ignore the fact that she was fanatically anti-Christian; asserting that compassion for the poor, the weak, and the powerless was itself a sign of weakness.
unblock
(52,374 posts)determinism is the philosophy that all events, including human decisions and emotions, are predetermined and could, in theory, be prefectily predicted by someone having enough detailed information as to the present status of all matter and energy in the universe.
rand rejected this theory in favor of the theory you describe, called "objectivism".
Aristus
(66,474 posts)Thanks for the correction.
BlueJazz
(25,348 posts)Do as I say, not as I do
freshwest
(53,661 posts)Ayn Rand, Hugely Popular Author and Inspiration to Right-Wing Leaders, Was a Big Admirer of Serial Killer
http://www.alternet.org/story/145819/ayn_rand%2C_hugely_popular_author_and_inspiration_to_right-wing_leaders%2C_was_a_big_admirer_of_serial_killer?paging=off
I've talked about this on a few threads, but here are some threads here on DU about Ayn Rand. We can't afford to bury our heads in the sand about this:
Paul Ryans Guru Ayn Rand Worshipped a Serial Killer Who Kidnapped and Dismembered Little Girls
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021118602
ATLAS SHRIEKED: Ayn Rand's first love was a sadistic serial killer
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x913404
Mike Wallace interviewed her it is on youtube she is reserved and careful but the points she makes cement her fascist ideology.
eShirl
(18,505 posts)for anyone interested in trying to stomach it
BumRushDaShow
(129,651 posts)Just got done watching. I don't even recognize the Mike Wallace from that interview considering what he devolved into before he died.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)He doesn't say 'genocide' here, but at 3:30 he gets to the point. AFAIK, genocide comes from a planned, intentional act. Things he cites are from plans that shorten the lives of the poor. They are considered to be lesser human beings, not equals.
Suffering is intentionally inflicted on the poor, the people Ayn Rand calls 'parasites.' The GOP ascribes to a religious doctrine that claims God gives riches to the wealthy because of their higher morality. Thus it wrong to demand the rich pay taxes because it's God's will.
This assumes those temporarily or long-term in poverty are not part of the whole of the system, but ae disposable items. And even if the rich benefit from impoverishing others, it is the 'just desserts' of those made poor, for being morally destitute. Their poverty requires punishment, to the point of death.
When a business finds something is not good for the bottom line, it is eliminated. It or them, in this case, by denying them first the means to live in the fabled 'free market' and then deny them means to live with welfare and thus eliminate them from the gene pool.
S.C. Lt. Gov. Andre Bauer Compares Helping Poor to Feeding Stray Animals
"My grandmother was not a highly educated woman, but she told me as a small child to quit feeding stray animals," Bauer said during a town hall meeting, as the Greenville News reported over the weekend. "You know why? Because they breed. You're facilitating the problem if you give an animal or a person ample food supply. They will reproduce, especially ones that don't think too much further than that. And so what you've got to do is you've got to curtail that type of behavior. They don't know any better."
As the Greenville News notes, more than half of the students in South Carolina participate in a program that allows them to get their lunch for free, or at a reduced cost.
Bauer later said he wasn't saying those who receive government help "were animals or anything else."
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-6139186-503544.html
Note Bauer tried to take back the exact same words he said. After listening to Rush, Boortz, and other hate radio pundits, the rhetoric from these Koch-influenced shills affects voters and those in charge of the purse strings of this country.
They are hostile to the life of many people. Clearly, they don't desire for all of us to survive.
MissMarple
(9,656 posts)There are several interviews, some with Mike Wallace and Phil Donahue
Warpy
(111,370 posts)and the rest of us are rabble meant to service them.
It's a very seductive philosophy for punks in general, but rich punks don't tend to outgrow it.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)Ayn Rand, (1905-1982), was an American author and social critic. Her books serve mainly as a means of expressing her philosophies. Literary critics tend to see them as marred by a tendency to instruct the reader.
Rand's best-known novels are THE FOUNTAINHEAD (1943) and ATLAS SHRUGGED (1957). Both present a moral and economic philosophy, called Objectivism, based on individualism and self-interest. These novels express the belief that original ideas are the main force in the world and that creative individuals deserve to profit from their ideas. The heroes represent disciplined, rational people of action who reject organized religion. In THE FOUNTAINHEAD, an architect destroys a housing project in which his ideas had been altered. In ATLAS SHRUGGED, one of the central characters calls a "mind strike," during which all creative people withhold their ideas from the rest of the world. The strike reveals that society cannot exist without creative genius.
Rand was born in St. Petersburg, Russia. She moved to the United States in 1926 and became a U.S. citizen in 1931. Her novels WE THE LIVING (1936) and ANTHEm (1938) reflect her early life in Russia. Both novels express her revolt against socialist forms of government. Rand also wrote about her philosophies in such works of nonfiction as FOR THE NEW INTELLECTUAL (1961), THE VIRTUE OF SELFISHNESS (1964), and CAPITALISM, THE UNKNOWN IDEAL (1966).
Contributor:
Arthur M. Saltzman, Ph.D., Professor of English, Missouri Southern State College.
**************************************************************
She took things to an un-understandable level, but having experienced certain things in her life, she came to the conclusion that objectivism was the best philosophy. She had lived through two revolutions in Russia, including the Bolshevik Revolution. Her family's business and property had been confiscated and given away. A lifetime of hard work taken away, in the name of socialism. So it is maybe understandable her philosophy went the other way.
In her later years, despite a lifetime of work, she ended up with not a lot of money, and had to take Social Security, despite her objections to social programs. Her feelings were that she paid into it, so she was entitlted to it, and needed it. Medicare provided her much needed health care that she couldn't pay for. Others who had been against socialism, like her, had refused to take Social Security.
I can guess that, despite her protests to the contrary, she may have had a slight change of heart at the end of her life, having then experienced what millions of others already knew: that you can work hard an entire lifetime, in a capitalistic society where you theoretically get paid what you're worth, and still end up not being able to get medical care or pay your bills. I believe her belief before then had been that others were not intelligent or didn't work hard, and that's why they had less money, and that was how things should be.
romantico
(5,062 posts)Some of this sounded familiar but I could not remember exactly. Thanks for refreshing my memory. I do recall her hypocrisy on taking advantage of the system she condemned.
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)novels written so moronically that even teenage boys could "get" the stupid message.
lowest common denominator libertarianism, that's why.
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)^snip^
14. The alleged short-cut to knowledge, which is faith, is only a short circuit destroying the mind.
15. Faith is the worse curse of mankind, as the exact antithesis and enemy of thought.
20. To rest one's case on faith means to concede that reason is on the side of one's enemies- that one has no rational arguments to offer.
http://listverse.com/2007/12/13/top-25-ayn-rand-quotes/
^snip^
11. Money is the barometer of a societys virtue.
9. It only stands to reason that where theres sacrifice, theres someone collecting the sacrificial offerings. Where theres service, there is someone being served. The man who speaks to you of sacrifice is speaking of slaves and masters, and intends to be the master.
8. Individual rights are not subject to a public vote; a majority has no right to vote away the rights of a minority; the political function of rights is precisely to protect minorities from oppression by majorities.
BumRushDaShow
(129,651 posts)One of the few immigrants who came here not to move us forward, but to aid and abet moving us backwards -all while feeding from the government trough while railing against it. A true huckster.
romantico
(5,062 posts)I found this. Disturbing.
"Rand also believed that the scientific consensus on the dangers of tobacco was a hoax. By 1974, the two-pack-a-day smoker, then 69, required surgery for lung cancer. And it was at that moment of vulnerability that she succumbed to the lure of collectivism"
She was coming to a point in her life where she was going to receive the very thing she didnt like, which was Medicare and Social Security, Pryor told McConnell. I remember telling her that this was going to be difficult. For me to do my job she had to recognize that there were exceptions to her theory. So that started our political discussions. From there on with gusto we argued all the time."
http://www.alternet.org/story/149721/ayn_rand_railed_against_government_benefits,_but_grabbed_social_security_and_medicare_when_she_needed_them
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)her touting Objectivism and pretending she'd never ever really wanted to have hit films and books. Bitter as any of them, and there are plenty of them.