Page 1 of the NY Times for tomorrow, 10/3, featuring the story on Trump family finances

[highplainsdem]

Thanks to a tweet from NYT print editor Tom Jolly:

Link to tweet

[mobeau69]

2. Excellent.

Thanks for posting.

[roamer65]

3. Congrats deplorables, you got conned.

Remember that when you pay 25 percent more on your Chinese crap at Dollar General.

[rgbecker]

4. Really odd that the Times would run this at this time.

Obviously it has been in the mill for some time. So why now, on a Wednesday during a week of total turmoil concerning the nomination of Supreme Court Justice?

Are they trying to trigger off Trump? Are they looking to undermine Trump so the fence sitting Senators feel no fealty for him?

Who is going to take the time to take all that info in in the middle of watching the lying bastards trying to put a lying bastard on the Supreme Court?

[Corgigal]

7. This should have been done 20 years ago,

when we NY'ers just thought he was a dumbass. He still is but now he's a dumbass country president. The media should have destroyed him way before this clown had a chance.

Times late to the party, but at least trying now.

[Duppers]

9. Indeed!

[Dorian Gray]

12. New Yorkers

didn't just think he was a dumbass. We knew.

This story SHOULD be explosive. But we've weathered kids being torn from their parents and accusations of sexual assault, so, what's a little tax evasion?

[phylny]

13. You are right. I say this to anyone who will listen.

Anyone who lived or worked in Manhattan in the 80s and beyond knew he was a fraud.

[Dorian Gray]

14. He's from NYC

and he lost us.... BIGLY.

That should be telling.


I am so so so much looking forward to the day where I don't have to see his face anymore.

[OnDoutside]

15. Yes, it seems like SQUIRREL time at the NYT. They could have run this next week, it's not as if we

didn't know how corrupt the Trumps were.


Shame on the NYT, in Trump's pocket.

[Roland99]

5. Rather mundane headline for that column

[Duppers]

8. I thought the same.

That Times headline could have said a lot more....and should have been a LOT SOONER.

On edit: Rachel's show has some answers... the Times reporter has been working on this for quite some time apparently and it has happened somewhat organically.

Start watching at the 27 min mark, to save time:

[Maven]

6. BEFORE THE ELECTION would have been helpful

[JI7]

10. i give credit to those who worked on this. but the media and govt officials should

have been going after him long time ago. he should never have gotten to this point.

we already know there were some payoffs where ny state officials held off going after some of the family.

if it was some minority or woman who was behaving as he did people would have gone after them then.

but he was allowed to just go by each day with the bs. showing up at fundraisers without giving anything. photo ops.

[Hugin]

11. Sorry, I already knew Trump is a dirt bag.

Right now, I'm trying to keep another dirt bag from getting a lifetime appointment to the SCOTUS.

Let's not get distracted by the obvious.

[OnDoutside]

16. +1