Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy don't we put Karl Rove on the Supreme Court while we're
At it. Or Frank Luntz. Or Ann Coulter. Or Roger Stone. Or Lee Atwater.
I guess we'll be spared Atwater, who is dead.
Kavanaugh is not a lawyer and a judge as much as he is a Republican dirty trickster who was awarded with a judgeship by W for his loyalty to Republican dirty tricks. This is what (among a million other things) makes him unfit for the SC
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 591 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why don't we put Karl Rove on the Supreme Court while we're (Original Post)
ProfessorPlum
Oct 2018
OP
C_U_L8R
(45,002 posts)1. I see you've read their plan
It's that and worse.
CanonRay
(14,103 posts)2. I was thinking Roger Stone
would be good. He's fair, honest and impartial. Vomit.
anarch
(6,535 posts)3. or Alex Jones
or David Duke, why not. Or that Roosh V asshole, whatever his name is.
procon
(15,805 posts)4. Rove almost seems quaint in comparison to today's bunch. nt