Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
Thu Oct 4, 2018, 09:51 AM Oct 2018

The last stand of logic? Will Republicans get away with falsely framing a job interview and a trial

of character and fitness for a high Office into a criminal trial? Easy counter to that: What criminal investigation of multiple major felones is restricted by command to 5 days? Backup counter: And decided by a jury of Eleven Angry Biased Men Only??

Why do you think Republicans used a prosecutor of sexual offences as their front person when things got heated? It was not to appear fair or because they lacked courage, it was the beginning of the framing that carries on to this very day.

Are WE going to be cast as the haters of the rule of law by propagandists twisting reality into their own shaping, and then the awesomely predictable rollout of screaming "no corroboration", a legal term, endlessly into the political winds? WE are the NOT haters of the rule of law...some have been fucking paying attention to who hates the rule of law with red hot passion, America? Media? It ain't Democrats!

Brett is guilty of lack of fit judicial character or temperament or political neutrality and the FBI supplemental background check report or collection of 9 interviews (not a criminal investigation even fucking seeking or permitted to discover corroboration) WILL corroborate the unfitness.

Beyond reasonable doubt.

Will Republicans ignore that definition of corroboration? I think I know the answer, but will the media?

Also, since the WH saw fit to opine on the contents and the conclusions of the interviews, "no corroboration!", to the Public...shouldn't the Public now have full access to what they speak of and conclude so we can arrive at our own fucking conclusions? YOU let that genie out of the bottle!

So why is the Public left in the dark...if you open your mealy mouths to speak of the contents?? And the conclusions!

Explain that one!

Raj? Raj?

...................

Edit:

Also, Raj and the WH may want to explain this, 100,000 Churches get it:

The National Council of Churches, a group that represents more than 100,000 churches and 40 million churchgoers across America, is calling for the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to be withdrawn, saying he has “disqualified himself” with his own behavior.

“We believe he has DISQUALIFIED himself from this lifetime appointment and must step aside immediately,” the council said in a statement.

The faith group pointed to Kavanaugh’s disgraceful behavior at last week’s Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, noting he showed “extreme partisan bias” and demonstrated he lacks the “temperament” and “character” to be on the Supreme Court.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The last stand of logic? ...