General Discussion

Miles Archer

(18,837 posts) Thu Oct 4, 2018, 11:37 AM Oct 2018

Flake says "no new corroboration" of Ford's allegations in the FBI report he just reviewed

Alex Bolton
‏
Verified account

@alexanderbolton

Sen. Jeff Flake says “there is no new corroboration” of Christine Blasey Ford’s allegations in the FBI report he just reviewed.

8:32 AM - 4 Oct 2018

Link to tweet

14 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Flake says "no new corroboration" of Ford's allegations in the FBI report he just reviewed (Original Post) Miles Archer Oct 2018 OP

That was the idea! Turbineguy Oct 2018 #1

*Who* all were interviewed? Proud Liberal Dem Oct 2018 #2

They refused to interview Ford or Kavanuagh, or and witnesses to coohborate their statements still_one Oct 2018 #4

It was a complete sham IMHO Proud Liberal Dem Oct 2018 #6

yup still_one Oct 2018 #8

Flake is flaking out, once again. issuesDemocrats Oct 2018 #3

He shall be come... FarPoint Oct 2018 #5

Well then. Go with the EARLIER corroboration. Zambero Oct 2018 #7

Well, he's a yes vote then. bearsfootball516 Oct 2018 #9

Well, that was carefully put. Gidney N Cloyd Oct 2018 #10

You guys were really expecting awesomerwb1 Oct 2018 #11

so, all repugs hide behind fake pres, fake investigation Hermit-The-Prog Oct 2018 #12

I seem to be having trouble sleeping these days. Taraman Oct 2018 #13

No new corroboration... does that mean there was old corroboration? Johonny Oct 2018 #14

Turbineguy

(37,337 posts)

1. That was the idea!

Reply to Miles Archer (Original post)

Thu Oct 4, 2018, 11:38 AM

Oct 2018

Help trump commit his crimes!

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,412 posts)

2. *Who* all were interviewed?

Reply to Miles Archer (Original post)

Thu Oct 4, 2018, 11:39 AM

Oct 2018

still_one

(92,204 posts)

4. They refused to interview Ford or Kavanuagh, or and witnesses to coohborate their statements

Reply to Proud Liberal Dem (Reply #2)

Thu Oct 4, 2018, 11:41 AM

Oct 2018

gee, I guess nothing to see here

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,412 posts)

6. It was a complete sham IMHO

Reply to still_one (Reply #4)

Thu Oct 4, 2018, 11:43 AM

Oct 2018

It was a sham of a mockery of a travesty!

still_one

(92,204 posts)

8. yup

Reply to Proud Liberal Dem (Reply #6)

Thu Oct 4, 2018, 11:44 AM

Oct 2018

issuesDemocrats

(91 posts)

3. Flake is flaking out, once again.

Reply to Miles Archer (Original post)

Thu Oct 4, 2018, 11:39 AM

Oct 2018

FarPoint

(12,408 posts)

5. He shall be come...

Reply to issuesDemocrats (Reply #3)

Thu Oct 4, 2018, 11:42 AM

Oct 2018

No One ... after tomorrow if he votes for Kavanaugh...We shall remember!....

Zambero

(8,964 posts)

7. Well then. Go with the EARLIER corroboration.

Reply to Miles Archer (Original post)

Thu Oct 4, 2018, 11:44 AM

Oct 2018

Include last Thursday's perjury, blatant partisanship, refusal to answer questions, and unfit demeanor as well.

bearsfootball516

(6,377 posts)

9. Well, he's a yes vote then.

Reply to Miles Archer (Original post)

Thu Oct 4, 2018, 11:45 AM

Oct 2018

Gidney N Cloyd

(19,838 posts)

10. Well, that was carefully put.

Reply to Miles Archer (Original post)

Thu Oct 4, 2018, 11:45 AM

Oct 2018

awesomerwb1

(4,268 posts)

11. You guys were really expecting

Reply to Miles Archer (Original post)

Thu Oct 4, 2018, 11:49 AM

Oct 2018

Flake to do the right thing? And Collins?

When will you learn?

Hermit-The-Prog

(33,348 posts)

12. so, all repugs hide behind fake pres, fake investigation

Reply to Miles Archer (Original post)

Thu Oct 4, 2018, 11:50 AM

Oct 2018

There is now not a single branch of government in which I have any trust whatsoever.

It's all a fake; bought out.

Taraman

(373 posts)

13. I seem to be having trouble sleeping these days.

Reply to Miles Archer (Original post)

Thu Oct 4, 2018, 11:54 AM

Oct 2018

Isn't there a single Republican with any integrity? Patriotism? No one?

Johonny

(20,851 posts)

14. No new corroboration... does that mean there was old corroboration?

Reply to Miles Archer (Original post)

Thu Oct 4, 2018, 12:28 PM

Oct 2018

Reply to this discussion