General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWould abstaining from this vote do anything?
I'm pretty sure that Kavano will get confirmed today. So are Senators allowed to abstain from voting?
I would think that would have a greater affect then voting no. Thoughts?
LandOfHopeAndDreams
(872 posts)And Slim has left the building.
Not going to happen. They'll want their vote on the record, meaningless as that is in the scheme of things.
BumRushDaShow
(129,076 posts)Separation
(1,975 posts)If its known that they dont have the votes to stop his confirmation. I believe that abstaining from this vote in protest of the sham that this whole thing has become, would have a greater effect than a no vote.
It would to me anyways. It would be seen more as a protest than just a no vote.
Of course this opinion and $2 might get you a large coffee somewhere.
BumRushDaShow
(129,076 posts)I just emphasized "effect" to mean that I don't see where it would "enhance" or have any more "positive outcome" regarding the position of Democrats on this particular nominee.
Usually those who "abstain" get the "bigger bang for their abstention" when they go against the wishes of their own party.
Separation
(1,975 posts)In a normal situation. I dont believe that this is one of them. Obviously it would have to be a party wide abstention.
It's interesting days we live in.
OnDoutside
(19,960 posts)no more.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)> So are Senators allowed to abstain from voting?
Senators can not vote on anything they don't want to vote on.
Separation
(1,975 posts)If you dont think that the Republicans will have an exact total going into tomorrow's confirmation. Then I'm not sure what to say honestly
lame54
(35,293 posts)MiniMe
(21,716 posts)ananda
(28,866 posts)??
Separation
(1,975 posts)Exactly! That would send a message.