Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Would abstaining from this vote do anything? (Original Post) Separation Oct 2018 OP
Slim To None LandOfHopeAndDreams Oct 2018 #1
What "effect" would it have except eschewing one's duty? BumRushDaShow Oct 2018 #2
Sorry for the "typo" Separation Oct 2018 #5
I didn't actually realize you had a typo BumRushDaShow Oct 2018 #7
Correct. Separation Oct 2018 #8
No. You would gut Dem activists that you didn't try to the bitter end. Fight til you can fight OnDoutside Oct 2018 #3
How will he be confirmed today with the vote currently being scheculed for Friday? PoliticAverse Oct 2018 #4
The votes are known before something like this Separation Oct 2018 #6
Proudly vote no lame54 Oct 2018 #9
The "no" votes don't matter as long as they have 50 or more Yes votes MiniMe Oct 2018 #10
How about every Dem just walk out and boycott! ananda Oct 2018 #11
Thats exactly my point. Separation Oct 2018 #12
 
1. Slim To None
Thu Oct 4, 2018, 01:01 PM
Oct 2018

And Slim has left the building.

Not going to happen. They'll want their vote on the record, meaningless as that is in the scheme of things.

Separation

(1,975 posts)
5. Sorry for the "typo"
Thu Oct 4, 2018, 01:13 PM
Oct 2018

If its known that they dont have the votes to stop his confirmation. I believe that abstaining from this vote in protest of the sham that this whole thing has become, would have a greater effect than a no vote.

It would to me anyways. It would be seen more as a protest than just a no vote.

Of course this opinion and $2 might get you a large coffee somewhere.

BumRushDaShow

(129,076 posts)
7. I didn't actually realize you had a typo
Thu Oct 4, 2018, 01:27 PM
Oct 2018


I just emphasized "effect" to mean that I don't see where it would "enhance" or have any more "positive outcome" regarding the position of Democrats on this particular nominee.

Usually those who "abstain" get the "bigger bang for their abstention" when they go against the wishes of their own party.

Separation

(1,975 posts)
8. Correct.
Thu Oct 4, 2018, 01:47 PM
Oct 2018

In a normal situation. I dont believe that this is one of them. Obviously it would have to be a party wide abstention.

It's interesting days we live in.

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
4. How will he be confirmed today with the vote currently being scheculed for Friday?
Thu Oct 4, 2018, 01:03 PM
Oct 2018

> So are Senators allowed to abstain from voting?

Senators can not vote on anything they don't want to vote on.

Separation

(1,975 posts)
6. The votes are known before something like this
Thu Oct 4, 2018, 01:16 PM
Oct 2018

If you dont think that the Republicans will have an exact total going into tomorrow's confirmation. Then I'm not sure what to say honestly

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Would abstaining from thi...