Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

boston bean

(36,222 posts) Thu Oct 4, 2018, 10:17 PM Oct 2018

WSJ editoral from kavaNAH - epitome of wme

White male entitlement.

And another political maneuver while saying how innocent he is and is always fair and impartial while we all saw what we saw. And he thinks his word should just be accepted. Why?? Cause he is a wm??

Imagine if any women has behaved they way he has?? She would have been slaughtered with sexism and misogyny.

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

WSJ editoral from kavaNAH - epitome of wme (Original Post) boston bean Oct 2018 OP

Why does he keep trying to win if he's already won?? Brett seems uncertain about his future. PubliusEnigma Oct 2018 #1

Irony. Republicans claim that the FBI did not need to interview Dr. Ford because she already Trust Buster Oct 2018 #2

So he is saying he lied during his hearing??? Hahaha Freethinker65 Oct 2018 #3

PubliusEnigma

(1,583 posts)

1. Why does he keep trying to win if he's already won?? Brett seems uncertain about his future.

Reply to boston bean (Original post)

Thu Oct 4, 2018, 10:21 PM

Oct 2018

Trust Buster

(7,299 posts)

2. Irony. Republicans claim that the FBI did not need to interview Dr. Ford because she already

Reply to boston bean (Original post)

Thu Oct 4, 2018, 10:23 PM

Oct 2018

Testified. Yet, this bozo gets to testify again without being asked a single question or having to take an oath.

Freethinker65

(10,024 posts)

3. So he is saying he lied during his hearing??? Hahaha

Reply to boston bean (Original post)

Thu Oct 4, 2018, 10:25 PM

Oct 2018

His public display of hatred of the Clintons and the "left" was the only time he seemed to be honest and non-evasive nor twitchy.

Was the editorial written by Brett or Bart?

Reply to this discussion