General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIf Manchin is a yes, should he be thrown out of the party?
Not for freely exercising his right to vote as he wishes, but for voting for a nominee who showed under testimony that he is a partisan POS by attacking the integrity of Democrats.
brooklynite
(94,598 posts)lame54
(35,294 posts)TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)to West Virginia.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,735 posts)and therefore who gets to control committees. Otherwise he's pretty useless most of the time.
violetpastille
(1,483 posts)By the record, the worst Democrat Senator is better than the "worst/best" Republican Senator. (Rand!)
Liberty Belle
(9,535 posts)Even if that's four years away, and that if he votes "yes" as the deciding vote he will not be given any plum committee assignments if Dems take back control of the Senate.
They should encourage him to get a sudden case of the flu and just miss the vote, since an absence is as good as a no vote.
LandOfHopeAndDreams
(872 posts)6 Years is an eternity.
aeromanKC
(3,324 posts)McConnell would not have the gavel!!
Kaleva
(36,312 posts)Blue_true
(31,261 posts)Let's get to the source of the current problem.
Kaleva
(36,312 posts)About 35% of Democrats who were registered in 2016 didn't vote.
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/registered-voters-who-stayed-home-probably-cost-clinton-the-election/
Timewas
(2,195 posts)Who votes yes for this ass hat is not a dem... no ifs and's or buts about it...
procon
(15,805 posts)By fiat, do we get to vote, I don't recall seeing that done before. What is the procedure?
sarisataka
(18,663 posts)A tribal council and vote him out of the party
... Unless he found the Senate immunity Idol, then he is safe for this vote
quadtetra
(46 posts)You probably can't stop him from registering as a Dem. But the other Senators can vote to expel him from their caucus and stop recognizing him as a Dem. As far as elections go, the DNC also refuses to recognize him as a Dem and refuses to support him in any way.
procon
(15,805 posts)We might lose that seat, but other than a placeholder, what does he do for Democrats if he votes against theparty on critical issues?
quadtetra
(46 posts)If a Democrat ever votes for a Republican majority leader or speaker, then that Sen or Rep needs to be expelled immediately. But otherwise no.
Even if Manchin voted with Republicans 100% of the time, except when voting for majority leader, that's still better than a actual Republican that votes Republican including for leader.
WeekiWater
(3,259 posts)Autumn
(45,107 posts)I don't have any say in the matter.
eleny
(46,166 posts)I don't know what should be done. Maintaining numbers helps maintain control of committees.
And that's terribly important as we see today with the Judiciary. How different things would be if we had a Senate majority.
So we live though this horror and then we vote next month.
underthematrix
(5,811 posts)book_worm
(15,951 posts)scheming daemons
(25,487 posts)We need 51 people with "D" next to their names. We need a Democratic Majority Leader, because the Majority Leader controls the calendar.
Kicking a sitting senator out of the party's caucus, regardless how they vote, would be a very dumb move.
LAS14
(13,783 posts).... voting for K would be a strong factor in his keeping his seat, I'd go along with it. I'm gambling that a really awful conservative instead of, maybe, a morally respectable conservative is better than two or more conservatives of any stripe. We need to take back the senate!
mythology
(9,527 posts)Manchin isn't my ideal candidate, but compared to who else gets voted for in West Virginia, I'll take him.
davekriss
(4,618 posts)But in the meantime treated as a pariah.
LAS14
(13,783 posts)Pretty neat resource that I didn't know about. (This kind of breakdown. I did know about FiveThirtyEight.)
idcdu
(170 posts)Let's stop pretending. If Manchin votes yes, he's done, and if he votes no, his job is secure.
WV isn't that stupid.
Loki Liesmith
(4,602 posts)Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)For the record...
Summary of voting record: Senator Manchin opposes big business, environmental protection, financial sector regulation, gun control, hawkish foreign policy, foreign and humanitarian aid, humane immigration policy, taxing the middle class, military spending, domestic surveillance and supports taxing businesses, restrict money in politics, consumer protection, disaster relief, funding education, public health, labor rights and wages, lgbt rights, internet freedom, a robust safety net, higher spending, women's rights.
http://politicsthatwork.com/voting-record/Joe-Manchin-412391
Sorry, now I rest my case...rebuttal?
procon
(15,805 posts)Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)Loki Liesmith
(4,602 posts)Hes a warm body. All he needs to be.
BannonsLiver
(16,396 posts)Oh wait, hell be replaced by the fanatical, foaming at the mouth RWNJ hes running against? On second thought Id prefer Manchin, warts and all. Because I have a functioning brain.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)bearsfootball516
(6,377 posts)I'd rather have a Democrat who votes with Trump 60 percent of the time than a Republican who votes with Trump 100 percent of the time.
jalan48
(13,870 posts)Cartoonist
(7,317 posts)I'm pretty sure he would vote no on Kav.
wryter2000
(46,051 posts)He contributes to a majority, should we win the Senate. That's worth more than getting back at him for his vote.
However, I hope every woman in his life gives him a long talk about his priorities.
LibDemAlways
(15,139 posts)a picture of Manchin. He's a turd, but as long as there's a D after his name, he counts in the D column numberswise, so he's at least a useful turd.