Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
Fri Oct 5, 2018, 03:38 PM Oct 2018

The plaintive fake concern about the presumption of innocence is such a fucking Con Job.

Hiding behind Lady Liberty when she just admitted the hearing was not criminal trial!

Then actually trying to analyze the "evidence" as if it was a criminal trial...one with a caged investigation.

She is not that stupid, is she?

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The plaintive fake concern about the presumption of innocence is such a fucking Con Job. (Original Post) Fred Sanders Oct 2018 OP
Yes brain washed... BlueJac Oct 2018 #1
Her president sure didn't give the presumption of innocence to the actually innocent dawg day Oct 2018 #2
If someone comes in for a job interview Zoonart Oct 2018 #3
this whole thing is such bullshit. "you can't really prove he's a rapist, so we have to confirm him" anarch Oct 2018 #4

dawg day

(7,947 posts)
2. Her president sure didn't give the presumption of innocence to the actually innocent
Fri Oct 5, 2018, 03:40 PM
Oct 2018

young men in the Central Park case.
He wanted them dead.

The wealthy ALWAYS get the presumption of innocence.

Even when they're clearly guilty (TRUMP!), they're innocent in their own view, or rather, they don't care as long as they get away with it, which they usually do.

Zoonart

(11,870 posts)
3. If someone comes in for a job interview
Fri Oct 5, 2018, 03:43 PM
Oct 2018

With a good resume but a shit attitude, and then you learn he may be a drunk with sexual assault in his background, you do not have the go to court to in order to justify NOT hiring him.

anarch

(6,535 posts)
4. this whole thing is such bullshit. "you can't really prove he's a rapist, so we have to confirm him"
Fri Oct 5, 2018, 03:47 PM
Oct 2018

He's not fit for the fucking job! He's an obvious partisan hack and corporate shill who seems like he could use some anger management lessons; we're not asking for his head on a platter, he's just not SCOTUS material! These greedy fuckheads have ruined this country; I detest them so much.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The plaintive fake concer...