When it comes down to it, the assaults on women should not have been the deciding factor

[question everything]

Our senators should have concentrated on his opinions that presidents should be immune from prosecutions. Klobuchar, as far as I know, is the only one to have raised this. Can one imagine if Bill Clinton, with his own legal issues, had nominated someone like that?

And then, of course, it is his temperament.

I am so glad that both my senators were in the NO vote from the beginning. And perhaps it is not too late to approach other senators. But then, if supposedly even tempered Graham ended up howling at the moon, where can one turn?

[Freethinker65]

1. Nope. He lied under oath and vowed to be partisan

To seek revenge against everything Clinton and the "left". No impartiality required.

[BigmanPigman]

2. Everything he says and does is very un-justice like.

He is not approriate for this position. Too biased, political, vague, disrespectful, ill tempered, aggressive and he lies. You couldn't even get a job delivering papers with any of these traits.

[question everything]

3. Kick