Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSteve Schmidt started a fascinating thread on Twitter re: Saudi corruption in Washington, DC.
Some of the replies are really interesting.
Link to tweet
Some enterprising journalist should start a list naming every person and every firm that is on the Saudi payroll in Washington. The Saudi Lobby is a poster child for the corruption that runs rampant in Washington DC. Its all in the open. We just dont talk about it
1:16 PM - Oct 16, 2018
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
11 replies, 4545 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (81)
ReplyReply to this post
11 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Steve Schmidt started a fascinating thread on Twitter re: Saudi corruption in Washington, DC. (Original Post)
catbyte
Oct 2018
OP
GoCubsGo
(32,086 posts)1. Especially that first reply.
The one that features "Fox News Research". Especially if that is really Fox News' research group.
NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)8. you mean from Rhonda Harbison
all those Saudi links to Trump?
GoCubsGo
(32,086 posts)11. Yeah, that one.
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,547 posts)3. The Trump Hotel. NT
Scurrilous
(38,687 posts)4. K&R
SunSeeker
(51,607 posts)5. K & R
Tanuki
(14,919 posts)6. Would love to see this before the midterm!
MontanaMama
(23,333 posts)7. K&R
Wow. Just wow. Maybe Rachel will have some more on this tonight??
NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)9. She would need to research and fact-check
anything said by Schmidt and others. While she may be all over this as I type, I would think it would take several days (if not weeks) to get a major investigative story on air.
She might do an intro though.