Oh Wikileaks

[SHRED]

Link to tweet

[DetlefK]

1. And how would Wikileaks prove that Manafort never met Assange?

[struggle4progress]

2. "It's not recorded in our diaries"

[Tommy_Carcetti]

3. Where have I heard this before?

https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/325979-wikileaks-no-assange-roger-stone-backchannel

WikiLeaks: No Assange-Roger Stone back channel

By Olivia Beavers - 03/27/17 04:16 PM EDT

WikiLeaks is denying that longtime President Trump associate Roger Stone had a back-channel means to communicate with its founder, Julian Assange.

A spokesperson for WikiLeaks denied the existence of a back channel between Stone and Assange when asked by CNN.

“No communications, no channel,” the spokesperson wrote to CNN.

The representative suggested Stone made false claims because he wanted the press and attention.

“Stone is playing slovenly Democrat-aligned journalists like a fiddle, brilliantly inserting himself, as is his habit to raise his profile and market his books. He is entirely delighted with inviting scrutiny because of course, he is no one who knows nothing about anything and was pushed out of the Trump team a long time ago for just this type of opportunism,” the WikiLeaks representative wrote.

[Wellstone ruled]

4. Said this before,

sure looks like the "Agencies"are about to take out Trump and his Crime Syndicate. If you have been watching certain fired or retired FBI,CIA and other Investigative Persons. You just knew this was about to pop.


Because of Trump's appointments of People to try and stop any and all Investigations,people have made a personal decision for the good of the Country,to blow the lid off the can so to speak.