General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDavid Frum of The Atlantic--perfect take on the speech!
Last edited Wed Jan 9, 2019, 09:25 AM - Edit history (1)
A magnificent take-down.
Link to tweet
Cha
(297,692 posts)Thanks, ginny!
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)...and for the next two years will be a constant reminder of how ineffectual and amateurish his presiduncy is.
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)czarjak
(11,296 posts)Dorian Gray
(13,501 posts)are always worth reading, even if I don't always agree with him on policy. He's nailed Trump, though.
dalton99a
(81,590 posts)Hermit-The-Prog
(33,431 posts)ecstatic
(32,731 posts)littlemissmartypants
(22,808 posts)PatrickforO
(14,592 posts)a gross understatement of what the cost would actually be.
Consider Amendment 5. If the government wants the land abutting the US border with Mexico, they (we taxpayers) will have to purchase it, acre by acre, along a 1,200 mile frontier, at fair market value.
So, right away, we're looking at WAY more than $5 billion. Then, when we look at the engineering feat to build a 30 foot high concrete wall along that same 1,200 mile frontier, given that much of the land is uneven, we're looking at MAJOR cost overruns.
Then, of course, there is the actual purchase of materials, which will be more expensive because of Trump's own tariffs, and the construction crews.
So, this $5.7 boondoggle has suddenly become a $150 or $200 billion boondoggle.
You know what?
I'D RATHER HAVE HEALTHCARE.
anarch
(6,535 posts)for somebody...probably quite a few somebodies. I don't think fuckface cares even slightly about border security; he just has no choice about continuing to campaign for "the Wall" since it was such a major part of his first campaign strategy. He does care very strongly about thinking up new ways to transfer public funds into his own bank accounts and into those of his cronies, and I'm sure the "Wall" construction effort would be managed very much like the fictional Newark Esplanade and "Museum of Science and Trucking" on The Sopranos...that is, the main concern wouldn't be completing the construction project so much as keeping money flowing from public coffers into the pockets of criminals.
$5.7B? That's just a token amount to get things started.
I've been thinking how I'd be OK with my tax money going toward the study of how best to protect our borders, and would be fine if a Wall was part of that, based on expert recommendation...thing is, I'm talking about seawalls around some of our more low-lying coastal cities (hey, the coast is also a "border" , to partially mitigate the inevitable impacts of climate change. A system of seawalls would at least be more effective at slowing down the destruction of America's vulnerable cities than a concrete or even steel-slat wall would be at keeping out immigrants.
PatrickforO
(14,592 posts)In fact, I'm increasingly attracted to this 'green new deal' AOC is talking about. We've got to do something. Oh, I'm 60 so will probably be dead by the time it gets really bad, but why? Why not take some aggressive steps now for the sake of our children and grandchildren?
We spend far, far too much on wasteful junk we don't need and not enough on stuff that would actually make our lives better. Like healthcare. And stronger Social Security. The whole litany - affordable college, infrastructure.
But here's the thing. We need to do five things before any real change can happen.
1) Reverse Citizens United
2) Pass and enact Elizabeth Warren's Accountable Capitalism Act
3) Get enough state legislatures to pass National Popular Vote legislation to negate the Electoral College
4) Get back in the Paris agreements
5) Reverse the giant tax cut for billionaires and corporations the Republicans rammed down our throats in 2017
Well, there's more than four, aren't there? Trump and his wreckers have really fucked us over in favor of billionaires and corporations.
But these four would be a good start.
PatrickforO
(14,592 posts)One other thought.
If the national debt is money we owe to ourselves, then why are we paying it back to bankers and 'investors' with interest?
Why, when Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution clearly puts the responsibility for coining money on Congress, do we instead have the Fed, which is NOT quasi-governmental as the solemn talking heads would have you believe. Nope. The two banks that hold most of the interest in the Fed are JP Morgan Chase and Citibank and they are about profits, not public good.
The truth is that international bankers have created a system of worldwide scarcity where fewer and fewer people have almost all the wealth.
If you haven't, I'd like to recommend 'Web of Debt' by Ellen Brown. It is as much of an eye-opener as Zinn's People's History of the United States.
Volaris
(10,274 posts)Or his cut of the Grift...
JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)Doesn't matter how much this enabler of aggressive war and endless war crimes now pretends to be on the side of the angels, or how beautifully he writes. He is not your friend. If Trump attacks Iran, Frum will not be protesting.
orleans
(34,073 posts)when bill kristol tries to play nice-nice lately.
PDittie
(8,322 posts)kentuck
(111,110 posts)Achilleaze
(15,543 posts)JHB
(37,162 posts)The article may be a good read, but I'd advise also checking out what people who haven't been so wrong about so many things for so long have to say.
DeminPennswoods
(15,290 posts)Capperdan
(492 posts)Signs should be everywhere
bdamomma
(63,922 posts)could run him out of the country...we need to.
Response to ginnyinWI (Original post)
ariadne0614 This message was self-deleted by its author.