Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MelissaB

(16,420 posts)
Thu Jan 10, 2019, 01:35 AM Jan 2019

Mueller must file a report with Congress and Trump can't block it!

Terrific thread from the man who wrote the DOJ reg under which Special Counsel Mueller operates. Mueller must file a report with Congress and Trump can’t block it!



THREAD ON WHETHER MUELLER REPORT WILL BE PUBLIC, AND @washingtonpost STORY ABOUT TRUMP HIRING MANY NEW LAWYERS TO ASSERT EXEC PRIVILEGE. Short Answer: It will be public.

1.The special counsel rules, which I drafted at DOJ 20 years ago, contemplate 2 kinds of reports. One is a report from Mueller to the AG, at the close of his investigation: “a confidential report explaining the prosecution or declination decisions reached by the Special Counsel.”


2. That document is to be confidential. But there is a second, separate reporting requirement, which forces the AG to notify Congress “with an explanation for each action…upon conclusion of the Special Counsel’s investigation, including…

3. ... a description and explanation of instances (if any) in which the AG concluded that a proposed action by a Special Counsel was so inappropriate or unwarranted under established Departmental practices that it should not be pursued.”

4.That report must explain why the investigation has concluded, and any instance in which the AG overruled the Special Counsel. The provision was designed to ensure “Congressional and public confidence in the integrity of the process.”

5.Notably, we wrote the circumstances for an AG to overrule a Special Counsel very tightly—it has to violate “established Departmental practices.”

6. So, to take one hypothetical example, generic DOJ opinions about whether a sitting President could be indicted do not create an “established Departmental practice” about whether an individual could be indicted for successfully cheating in a Presidential election.

7.There is no DOJ established practice that says if a Presidential candidate cheats enough and wins the Presidency, that he gets a get-out-of-jail-free card.

8.There is one other important aspect to the regulations. If a Special Counsel is worried that the AG may cover something up, the regs give him an important weapon.

9.Because they require a mandatory report to Congress about any instance of the AG overruling a Special Counsel, they put the thumb on the scale of a Special Counsel telling the AG he will take a sensitive act and waiting for AG to say no. That triggers the reporting requirement.

10. It is a safeguard to prevent a cover-up, it creates a mandatory report to a separate and coequal branch of govt. So that is why I believe Mueller has a move left to play if Whitaker or Barr (if confirmed) try to stymie him and his full report.

11. Now the President can try to claim executive privilege. Nixon tried that, it didn’t turn out so well. He got crushed in the Supreme Court. Trump’s claim appears even weaker—much wont even concern presidential deliberations&the part that might (Comey) has been waived by Trump.

12.And here, there is another problem: Trump’s legal team has been saying they don’t think a sitting President can be indicted.

13. Leaving aside the point above in (6) and (7), the only way that claim makes any sense is if the President must be impeached first. Every real scholar who says a sitting President can’t be indicted couples that with a view that impeachment is the remedy.

14. So if the President asserts the view he can’t be indicted, he has to allow the turnover of all investigative material to Congress. Otherwise he would be no different than King George III, literally above the law.

15.This point is fleshed out in my NYT op-ed below. The key point is that even if you think Trump won't be indicted, his legal claims about his immunity from indictment set up&invite the launch of impeachment investigation+eviscerate his exec priv claims.


16. Bottom line: the President can try to hide the Mueller Report. He will lose to the public’s right to know.
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Mueller must file a report with Congress and Trump can't block it! (Original Post) MelissaB Jan 2019 OP
HUGE!! Cha Jan 2019 #1
Kick dalton99a Jan 2019 #2
Sweet! Excellent information! California_Republic Jan 2019 #3
Interesting. Adam Schiff on Rachel tonight said he thought trump or the justice dept might mucifer Jan 2019 #4
I posted this earlier BigmanPigman Jan 2019 #5
what theme song goes with those "Jail to the Chief" signs? Hermit-The-Prog Jan 2019 #6

California_Republic

(1,826 posts)
3. Sweet! Excellent information!
Thu Jan 10, 2019, 01:41 AM
Jan 2019

I well sleep better tonight. I was fearful that the acting AG was suppressing Mueller and maybe so but the final report will say if that happen.

mucifer

(23,557 posts)
4. Interesting. Adam Schiff on Rachel tonight said he thought trump or the justice dept might
Thu Jan 10, 2019, 01:56 AM
Jan 2019

be able to block the report from coming to congress.

BigmanPigman

(51,615 posts)
5. I posted this earlier
Thu Jan 10, 2019, 02:41 AM
Jan 2019

"If the GOP blocks Mueller's report the Dems can have him testify
to Congress and tell them what the conclusions of the investigation are. Rep. Nadler (Judiciary Comm)just told this to Chris Hayes.

This is one option to get around the GOP blocking Mueller's conclusions from being released to the public and them."

https://www.democraticunderground.com/100211649649

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Mueller must file a repor...