Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(71,996 posts)
Fri Jan 11, 2019, 10:24 PM Jan 2019

LAWFARE: It was about Russia. It was always about Russia. Full stop.

What if the Obstruction Was the Collusion? On the New York Times’s Latest Bombshell
By Benjamin Wittes Friday, January 11, 2019, 8:43 PM



...................

What is the significance of all of this? I have two big takeaways.

First, if this analysis is correct, it mostly—though not entirely—answers the question of the legal basis of the obstruction investigation. The president’s lawyers, Barr in his memo, and any number of conservative commentators have all argued that Mueller cannot reasonably be investigating obstruction offenses based on the president’s actions within his Article II powers in firing Comey; such actions, they contend, cannot possibly violate the obstruction laws. While this position is disputed, a great many other commentators, including me, have scratched their heads about Mueller’s obstruction theory.

But if the predicate for the investigation was rooted in substantial part in counterintelligence authorities—that is, if the theory was not just that the president may have violated the criminal law but also that he acted in a fashion that may constitute a threat to national security—that particular legal puzzle goes away. After all, the FBI doesn’t need a possible criminal violation to open a national security investigation.

The problem does not entirely go away, because as the Times reports, the probe was partly predicated as a criminal matter as well. So the question of Mueller’s criminal theory is still there. But the weight on it is dramatically less.

This possibility, of course, raises a different legal puzzle, which is whether and under what circumstances the president can be a national security investigative subject of his own FBI given that it is ultimately he who defines national security threats for the executive branch. But that’s a question for another day.

Second, if it is correct that the FBI’s principle interest in obstruction was not as a discrete criminal fact pattern but as a national security threat, this significantly blurs the distinction between the obstruction and collusion aspects of the investigation. In this construction, obstruction was not a problem distinct from collusion, as has been generally imagined. Rather, in this construction, obstruction was the collusion, or least part of it. The obstruction of justice statutes become, in this understanding, merely one set of statutes investigators might think about using to deal with a national security risk—specifically, the risk of a person on the U.S. side coordinating with or supporting Russian activity by shutting down the investigation.

It was about Russia. It was always about Russia. Full stop.




......


WAY MORE:
https://www.lawfareblog.com/what-if-obstruction-was-collusion-new-york-timess-latest-bombshell
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100211658856
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
LAWFARE: It was about Russia. It was always about Russia. Full stop. (Original Post) kpete Jan 2019 OP
Link? Thanks DURHAM D Jan 2019 #1
here you go: kpete Jan 2019 #2
Sounds like what Malcolm Nance has been saying is doc03 Jan 2019 #3
K&R Scurrilous Jan 2019 #4
Yup - get to the bottom of this - it shouldn't be too hard. chimpymustgo Jan 2019 #5
Benjamin Wittes - "I don't BOOM my own work" BumRushDaShow Jan 2019 #6
Watching now bdamomma Jan 2019 #7
K&R Andy823 Jan 2019 #8

chimpymustgo

(12,774 posts)
5. Yup - get to the bottom of this - it shouldn't be too hard.
Fri Jan 11, 2019, 10:42 PM
Jan 2019

Joy is having a field day on Rachel's show. Right now she's talking about the Russians' visit to the Oval Office, where he announced he had fired some FBI members!!

bdamomma

(63,875 posts)
7. Watching now
Fri Jan 11, 2019, 10:52 PM
Jan 2019

to us DU'ers is this news to us??? We know this so called President has been in the back pocket of Putin. He is a security threat to our country. We have seen all pouting, the looks between him and Putin that this has been going for a long time.

It is still going on our Government agencies have been gutted, i.e State Department, Justice Department etc. Putin wanted to see the destruction of the US. Hated President Obama, and Hillary Clinton. Putin wanted to neutralize US by using his Russian asset tRump.

We are seeing it now with this shutdown. Munuchin relaxing sanctions for Russia. Everything is falling into place, or just falling.

This has to stop.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»LAWFARE: It was about Rus...