Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhite House slams NYT report that FBI investigated whether Trump was a national security risk
White House slams NYT report that FBI investigated whether Trump was a national security risk
https://www.politico.com/story/2019/01/11/trump-fbi-russia-investigation-new-york-times-report-1098635
By BRENT D. GRIFFITHS
01/11/2019 10:22 PM EST
White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders slammed a New York Times report on Friday that said the FBI opened an inquiry into President Donald Trump shortly after he fired FBI Director James Comey that centered on whether the commander in chief was a national security threat to his own country.
"This is absurd," Sanders said in a statement provided to POLITICO. "James Comey was fired because hes a disgraced partisan hack, and his Deputy Andrew McCabe, who was in charge at the time, is a known liar fired by the FBI."
According to the Times' report, the FBI's investigation was related to whether Trump had obstructed justice by firing Comey but also included a counterintelligence component on whether Trump was knowingly working for Russia or had fallen under the Kremlin's influence a revelation that had not been previously reported.
Friday's report was based in part on the accounts of unnamed former law enforcement officials, "others familiar with the investigation" and former FBI general counsel James. A Baker's private congressional testimony.
....................................
But in an acknowledgment of just how serious an FBI investigation of a sitting president would be, the report details a "vigorous debate" among former law enforcement officials about whether the probe was an overreach.
Rudy Giuliani, Trump's attorney, said the FBI's investigation into Trump should have resulted in an outcome, otherwise the bureau is "imperiling our national security." But legal experts pointed out that a counterintelligence investigation is different from a criminal probe and the lack of previous public knowledge of the investigation or of any possible outcomes is not surprising.................................
Donald Trump
The FBI counterintelligence probe into President Donald Trump is separate from the previously known criminal investigation into whether the president obstructed justice. | Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty Images
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
10 replies, 1273 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
10 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
White House slams NYT report that FBI investigated whether Trump was a national security risk (Original Post)
riversedge
Jan 2019
OP
uponit7771
(90,347 posts)1. K&R, looks this is coming out as Benedict Donald has made 2 - 3 moves that benefit Russia DIRECTLY
Here recently
1. pull out of Syria
2. end sanctions on oligarchical business
3. Help Russia sell soy to China via his stupid trade war.
gademocrat7
(10,659 posts)3. Huckabuck Slanders has no credibility.
She is a pathological liar.
iluvtennis
(19,862 posts)4. Ditto
underpants
(182,826 posts)6. The Uncredible Huck
That's my favorite name for her
Crutchez_CuiBono
(7,725 posts)8. +1
Fuzzpope
(602 posts)5. Blood
Meet water.
Crutchez_CuiBono
(7,725 posts)9. Blood....meet soil...the gop needs a permanent dirt nap.
underpants
(182,826 posts)7. Yes, it is absurd. Saw this headline and thought DUH!
That's what the whole investigation is based on. Steele started his research by himself because he saw that the nominee of one a major party could very well be susceptible to blackmail.
Gothmog
(145,293 posts)10. Today's tweets
Link to tweet
?s=20