General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSo theTimes come out with the secret agent story now. Why the 'no clear link' story in 2016?
Link to tweet
To hone in: I dont care about an *apology* so much as an *explanation*. NYT screwed up some shit in 2016. Its OK. It was a hard election to cover. NYT is great. But the no clear link story is literally sort of incomprehensible, in light of subsequent reporting. What happened?
(end snip)
If the orange menace was even suspected of being a foreign agent why is he not at GITMO?
manor321
(3,344 posts)chimpymustgo
(12,774 posts)handle the bombshell. "You can't handle the truth!!!!!!"
Claritie Pixie
(2,199 posts)Whether we like it or not, accusing Individual-1 at that time without an airtight case would not have been effective.
Obama trusted our system to work even though damage is being done. I do too.
Mueller has the goods and will present them in such a way that NO ONE will be able to discredit.
shraby
(21,946 posts)the perps would have hidden stuff better and it would have put the FBI at a disadvantage.
comradebillyboy
(10,154 posts)Bill was elected in 1992.
delisen
(6,044 posts)Among the NY Times disgraces: Judith Miller's phony reporting on Iraq War -propaganda for Cheney and the GW Bush administration.
Hermit-The-Prog
(33,349 posts)Grasswire2
(13,571 posts)It would have been nuts to report on the information that was available to the FBI then, compared to what evidence is available after 2.5 years of investigation now. NYT likely had very little info then.
Hamlette
(15,412 posts)he was suspected because he said nice thing about Russia but even Comey admitted Trump was not under investigation in early 2017
delisen
(6,044 posts)right under the nose of The NY Times-they are part of the old boy network.
ProudLib72
(17,984 posts)Nasruddin
(754 posts)Pretty sure Hillary would take it, & they had a pretty good idea how both parties would react - why not break a few windows and sell a few more papers?
fierywoman
(7,685 posts)that be at the NYT who make the decisions?
Duppers
(28,125 posts)We need an explanation.
Pachamama
(16,887 posts)Reality is that no FBI official would have commented on an ongoing investigation and possibly even purposefuly put out disinformation at the time so as not to tip Trump, the Russians and affect any investigation.
A reporter has to go with what their sources says and they believe to be true. So the reporter and newspaper reported what they believed was true and what they had as information.
So it changed - no surprise there - that happens.
Nate Silver is off the mark there.