Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"Lordy, I hope there are intercepts"...Frank Figliuzzi "virtually certain that" the FBI has 'em.
Figluizzi predicted the FBI had additional evidence.
It means likely, Joy, even though the article is citing the public behavior of the president, as you just noted, in order to get this to pass muster, in order to get this through FBI headquarters, through teams of lawyers, across the street to the Department of Justice, to be the title name of an investigation, I am virtually certain that more evidence than just the public behavior of the president is involved in this and I think that evidence is likely classified evidence, he explained.
Reid noted that the National Security Agency had recently relaxed rules on sharing information with other governmental departments.
Does that tell you as a former assistant director for counterintelligence at the FBI that the FBI might have intercepted phone communications and signal intelligence about ongoing cooperation between the president of the United States and Russia? Reid asked.
The short answer is yes, Figliuzzi replied. But I dont even think that those relaxed regulations may play into that or not. They might, but from day one, Joy, youve heard the intelligence professionals saying there is much more to this iceberg than just the tip.
https://www.rawstory.com/2019/01/mueller-likely-classified-communications-intercepts-showing-trump-working-russia-ex-fbi-counterintel-chief/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 2643 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (27)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Lordy, I hope there are intercepts"...Frank Figliuzzi "virtually certain that" the FBI has 'em. (Original Post)
Miles Archer
Jan 2019
OP
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)1. Jiffy-Pop time?!?!
C_U_L8R
(45,003 posts)2. Forget the pee pee recording
Trump, on tape, selling out our country will shock even the wingiest wingnut.
dalton99a
(81,515 posts)3. It's also clear that Trump knows there is actual evidence
Hence his unrelenting public attacks against the FBI
Ford_Prefect
(7,901 posts)4. The question to ask is: When did McConnell know and what did he know?
Was it in February or August? Did he know the fix was in when he said no SC nominee for Obama? Did he know when he denied allowing telling the House and Senate, and the voters? who told him and who paid him? $3.5 million could make a very persuasive argument IMO.
watoos
(7,142 posts)5. 5 eyes knows everything
Other countries can eavesdrop on American communications And share the info with us.