Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Miles Archer

(18,837 posts)
Sat Jan 12, 2019, 01:32 PM Jan 2019

"Lordy, I hope there are intercepts"...Frank Figliuzzi "virtually certain that" the FBI has 'em.



Figluizzi predicted the FBI had additional evidence.

“It means likely, Joy, even though the article is citing the public behavior of the president, as you just noted, in order to get this to pass muster, in order to get this through FBI headquarters, through teams of lawyers, across the street to the Department of Justice, to be the title name of an investigation, I am virtually certain that more evidence than just the public behavior of the president is involved in this and I think that evidence is likely classified evidence,” he explained.

Reid noted that the National Security Agency had recently relaxed rules on sharing information with other governmental departments.

“Does that tell you — as a former assistant director for counterintelligence at the FBI — that the FBI might have intercepted phone communications and signal intelligence about ongoing cooperation between the president of the United States and Russia?” Reid asked.

“The short answer is yes,” Figliuzzi replied. “But I don’t even think that those relaxed regulations may play into that or not. They might, but from day one, Joy, you’ve heard the intelligence professionals saying there is much more to this iceberg than just the tip.”

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/01/mueller-likely-classified-communications-intercepts-showing-trump-working-russia-ex-fbi-counterintel-chief/
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Lordy, I hope there are intercepts"...Frank Figliuzzi "virtually certain that" the FBI has 'em. (Original Post) Miles Archer Jan 2019 OP
Jiffy-Pop time?!?! InAbLuEsTaTe Jan 2019 #1
Forget the pee pee recording C_U_L8R Jan 2019 #2
It's also clear that Trump knows there is actual evidence dalton99a Jan 2019 #3
The question to ask is: When did McConnell know and what did he know? Ford_Prefect Jan 2019 #4
5 eyes knows everything watoos Jan 2019 #5

C_U_L8R

(45,003 posts)
2. Forget the pee pee recording
Sat Jan 12, 2019, 01:42 PM
Jan 2019

Trump, on tape, selling out our country will shock even the wingiest wingnut.

dalton99a

(81,515 posts)
3. It's also clear that Trump knows there is actual evidence
Sat Jan 12, 2019, 02:11 PM
Jan 2019

Hence his unrelenting public attacks against the FBI

Ford_Prefect

(7,901 posts)
4. The question to ask is: When did McConnell know and what did he know?
Sat Jan 12, 2019, 04:13 PM
Jan 2019

Was it in February or August? Did he know the fix was in when he said no SC nominee for Obama? Did he know when he denied allowing telling the House and Senate, and the voters? who told him and who paid him? $3.5 million could make a very persuasive argument IMO.

 

watoos

(7,142 posts)
5. 5 eyes knows everything
Sat Jan 12, 2019, 04:21 PM
Jan 2019

Other countries can eavesdrop on American communications And share the info with us.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Lordy, I hope there are ...