General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow We'll Forget John Lennon
Last month Hidalgo and colleagues published a Nature paper that put his crafty data-mining talents to work on another question: How do people and products drift out of the cultural picture? They traced the fade-out of songs, movies, sports stars, patents, and scientific publications. They drew on data from sources such as Billboard, Spotify, IMDB, Wikipedia, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, and the American Physical Society, which has gathered information on physics articles from 1896 to 2016. Hidalgos team then designed mathematical models to calculate the rate of decline of the songs, people, and scientific papers.
The report, The universal decay of collective memory and attention, concludes that people and things are kept alive through oral communication from about five to 30 years. They then pass into written and online records, where they experience a slower, longer decline. The paper argues that people and things that make the rounds at the water cooler have a higher probability of settling into physical records. Changes in communication technologies, such as the rise of the printing press, radio and television, it says, affect our degree of attention, and all of our cultural products, from songs to scientific papers, follow a universal decay function.
http://nautil.us/issue/68/context/how-well-forget-john-lennon
So this is a little OT; however, think of the implications for political figures and events (such as Watergate). The last paragraph frightens me a bit. The media controls what makes the rounds at the water cooler, which in turn decides what makes it into the physical records. Anyway, the rest of the article is very interesting as it discusses what factors determine the decay of our society's collective memory.
MLAA
(17,310 posts)Then I remembered our climate change and how weve destroyed the planet, and I stopped worrying about the last paragraph. We wont be around long enough to worry about losing anything.
hlthe2b
(102,324 posts)ornotna
(10,805 posts)In Florida at least.
https://www.flhsmv.gov/dmv/specialtytags/
Wish California had something similar, but the state is concerned about issuing plates with any political messages. Some years back, anti-womens rights groups wanted a ban abortion plate, which was nixed, along with all other ideas of a political nature. Not that world peace should be forgotten as an ideal.
On edit: Note that Florida offers a Choose Life plate, which California avoided.
ornotna
(10,805 posts)Some good ones and some not my type.
VOX
(22,976 posts)Its been 73.5 years (in many cases, more than a lifetime) since nukes were used in actual conflict, and the horror of that world-changing event gets thinner every passing year. Nearly all first-person witnesses to that event are now deceased.
Also fading is the ability (and the interest) to comprehend the massive scale of death and destruction that only a world war can bring.
ProudLib72
(17,984 posts)He said that his grandfather was playing chess with a friend in Nagasaki when the bomb was dropped. One minute, his friend was across the table from him. The next minute his friend was vaporized. The grandfather was saved because he was sitting right behind the refrigerator.
Now, I don't know just how true this story is, and, admittedly, it has been nearly 20 years since he told me the story. However, I do remember him talking all about dropping nukes on Japan just like he was the one who had experienced it. So, in a way, I guess his cultural memory is much strong with regard to nukes. It's my generation that grew up during the Cold War that remembers duck and cover, the continual existential threat that the Soviet Union posed. I know that it would be hopeless to try and convey a sense of that threat to people 30 years old and younger. It must be a lived experience.
VOX
(22,976 posts)There are several crazy documented stories of near-misses in the conflagrations of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
I'm in the "duck and cover" generation as well. We also had a yellow siren that would test-warn for two minutes on the last Friday of each month at 10:00AM. The thought of nuclear annihilation was never far from our minds. Even our entertainments were reminders, as the family went to the neighborhood theatre to take in the grim "On the Beach," or the giddy insanity of "Dr. Strangelove."
Then there was October 1962, when all the parents on our street met to work out a plan... in case. That resulted in a string of sleepless nights.
And you're right, it's impossible to impress upon the 30-and-under demographic how it was a daily concern for the kids of the 1950s and 1960s.
dawg day
(7,947 posts)That sounds like John Lennon!
I hadn't ever hear his version of that before. It's pretty good, very touching-- he gets some real raspy passion in the chorus.
msongs
(67,430 posts)ProudLib72
(17,984 posts)Then I got into Hendrix. I remember asking a friend of my parents if she had any Hendrix albums. She laughed and said that would akin to someone in fifteen years asking me if I still had any Twisted Sister albums.
cemaphonic
(4,138 posts)and my folks still had hundreds of albums from the 60s-70s, including the Beatles and Hendrix.
ProudLib72
(17,984 posts)I really don't think it was a fair comparison. The Police? Maybe. Van Halen? Maybe. I realize it was an off the cuff remark she made, but it still shocked me as a teenager.
betsuni
(25,582 posts)I have a little rant. I'm reading Bob Colacello's book about Andy Warhol and Googled the words to Reed's "Walk on the Wild Side" yesterday because I couldn't remember which lyrics were about Candy Darling and which about Holly Woodlawn. Up pops an article about the song being played at a college event and students complaining it's transphobic. School apologized, "we'll do better."
Wait. We have these wonderful computer machines to look things up. Nobody thought to find out who Lou Reed was? It's still in the records! And this morning I read an interview with Reed in the other book I'm reading, Allen Jones' "Can't Stand Up For Falling Down" and Lou's boyfriend in 1977 is a transvestite, the inspiration for "Coney Island Baby." Better not play that song, either.
On a political note, when Googling something about Bob Colacello about fifteen minutes ago, up pops the video of a talk he gave a few years ago at ... wait for it ... Trigger Warning: GOLDMAN SACHS! How anyone fell for the giving-a-speech-at-Goldman-Sachs-makes-you-corrupt propaganda still amazes and sickens me.
ProudLib72
(17,984 posts)I'm willing to bet they had no idea at all who he was.
I just googled and found the article you were talking about: https://www.theguardian.com/music/2017/may/20/lou-reed-walk-wild-side-transphobic-lyrics-canada
Is Waiting for My Man racist? Or maybe Lou Reed was making commentary on American culture in the 70s?
betsuni
(25,582 posts)What are these damn kids learning in school? I thought the point was to learn how to research things, critical thinking.
ProudLib72
(17,984 posts)Marilyn Monroe painting. I like to ask the students who it is. Many of them get that it's Marilyn Monroe. Then I ask who created the image. Only rarely does someone know who Warhol was. We are talking 1 out of every 50 students know. Do you think anyone knows who Keith Haring was? Remember how he actually did one of those ID commercials for MTV?
But Lou Reed?! Fucking Lou Reed ladies and gentlemen, is not transphobic!
hlthe2b
(102,324 posts)I knew music from my parent's and to somewhat lesser degree, grandparent's times. Music from my parent's time still gets played on occasion in my home. Going much further back, we, of course know some of the music from the civil war era due to the ever present military and marching bands and use at national events. Of course we know on am admittedly highly varying level, classical music from centuries prior.
So, why is it a "given" that this current generation will (should) know nothing other than today's pop, hiphop or rap music?
ProudLib72
(17,984 posts)There is also the cultural/political context the music was produced in. Some kids might be intrigued by what was happening in the decade before they were born; others, not so much. Notice how you said you knew music from your parents' time, but you only knew music from your grandparents' time to a lesser degree? The relevance tends to fade with each generation.