General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhen Akin was in the MO House, he claimed women can't get HIV
because their bodies are "self-flushing"
True story.
Yes, this man really is that stupid.
sakabatou
(42,159 posts)barnabas63
(1,214 posts)Lone_Star_Dem
(28,158 posts)The more I hear, the more amazed I am by his lack of intellect. Seriously.
proud2BlibKansan
(96,793 posts)for the state to only fund pelvic exams every two years, but pap smears every year.
Lone_Star_Dem
(28,158 posts)Since you're already "there" a poke of my ovaries and a prod of my uterus is nothing. Especially considering how deadly ovarian cancer is if not detected very early.
What an idiot!
proud2BlibKansan
(96,793 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)niyad
(113,364 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)Last edited Mon Aug 20, 2012, 11:54 PM - Edit history (1)
The GOP Agenda: Controlling the Means of (Re)ProductionSometimes it takes me a while, but the pieces have finally slid into place. Like a lot of others, I have been mistakenly thinking that the GOPs legislative campaign against women is about domination or subversion or repression or some other kind of man-woman conflict. Its not at all. It is about dehumanization: the puppet party of business seeking dominion over the population by controlling our reproduction.
Consider that the ideal environment for multinational corporations is pretty much the opposite of what benefits humans:
Corporations would like to drive down the worldwide cost of human capital in order to own and manage a world economy. We have already seen how this is accomplished. On the production side, corporations play leapfrog, moving factories from country to country based on marginal labor savings. On the revenue side, they drain the private assets of countries whose citizens still have money. With no resources, the citizens are ripe to be exploited as the next labor force.
More at the link:
http://www.politicususa.com/the-gop-agenda-controlling-the-means-of-reproduction.html
Controlling the Means of Reproduction: An Interview with Michelle Goldberg
http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/print/9629
banned from Kos
(4,017 posts)Please cite or delete.
xmas74
(29,674 posts)but I do remember something along those lines a few years ago. I don't remember exactly what it was but it was about how women can't get AIDS.
proud2BlibKansan
(96,793 posts)Heard about it then and they were talking about it again yesterday.
He's amazingly stupid.
xmas74
(29,674 posts)long before all of this ever happened. She referred to it as "you can't fix stupid."
I tried to find a link online but no luck-it's just too many places to search and I don't have the time to read through it all.
proud2BlibKansan
(96,793 posts)back in the 80s I believe.
And no, I won't delete. Dad.
jorno67
(1,986 posts)was he home schooled?
Liberal Veteran
(22,239 posts)Good lord, this man doesn't need to be anywhere near a position that he can influence women's health care legislation.
proud2BlibKansan
(96,793 posts)He's been in Congress for 12 years.
Lone_Star_Dem
(28,158 posts)We have a real chance to get him out. Thank goodness!
spanone
(135,846 posts)proud2BlibKansan
(96,793 posts)No, I don't get it either.
Akin was elected to the Missouri House of Representatives in 1988, representing Town and Country and much of West County (St. Louis area). He won re-election in 1990 (59%), 1992 (100%), 1994 (70%), 1996 (67%), and 1998 (66%).
He's been a US House representative since 2001.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Todd_Akin
speedoo
(11,229 posts)Maybe she just pretends he does not say these idiotic things?
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)These insights into what he believes about women are really disturbing. That he has given my body and processes this extensive thought really disgusts me.
citizen blues
(570 posts)Response to proud2BlibKansan (Original post)
citizen blues This message was self-deleted by its author.