General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLegitimate Rape is the Tip of the Republican War on Women Iceberg
A broad, overall view or perspective of an issue is often referred to as the big picture, and it typically has several related facets that individually contribute to a larger agenda. If one steps back and takes an overall view of the 112th Congress, it is impossible to miss the big picture that Republicans have used a multi-faceted approach in their war on women, and especially their right to choose their own reproductive health. For the past couple of days, there has been a firestorm over comments made by Representative Todd Akin regarding what he calls legitimate rape, and although it is a big story, it is just a microcosm of the entire GOPs overall view of women.
Akins remark that in the case of legitimate rape, a womans body mysteriously blocks conception sparked outrage and disbelief for more than one reason. Many were stunned at Akins lack of understanding of human biology and the reproductive process, and many more were dumbfounded that he differentiated between legitimate rape and an insane notion that there is something called illegitimate rape. However, it is unfair to single out Akin when his comments have been part and parcel of the entire Republican Partys opinion of women and their right to choose their own reproductive health. It was curious to watch Republicans abandon and condemn Akin over his remarks on legitimate rape and conception, especially when they have voted with him to eliminate womens right to choose throughout the 112th Congress.
The Romney campaign team issued a statement that a Romney-Ryan administration would not oppose abortion in instances of rape, but as critics began connecting Paul Ryan to Akin it became glaringly obvious that Ryan and Romney share his twisted pro-life position. This column has pointed out that Paul Ryan co-sponsored, with Akin, a national personhood bill that defines a single-celled zygote as having all the rights of an American citizen ever since Romney tapped him for vice-president. However, Ryans history of support for anti-choice legislation goes back farther than his support for a personhood bill. Last year, Ryan co-sponsored the No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act that redefined rape to limit access to abortion services, and his Path to Prosperity budget slashes funding for Medicaid and Title X that provides low-income women with contraception and family planning counseling. Last year, Ryan supported amending Title X to prohibit grants from being awarded to groups like Planned Parenthood, and Romney said he would scrap the Title X program entirely to cut costs. However, according to the Guttmacher Institute, every dollar spent helping women avoid pregnancy saves $3.74 in Medicaid spending so the issue is not cutting costs, but ending womens right to choose when they give birth.
The prescient question is; what is the basis of Ryan, Romney, Akin, and the rest of the Republicans pro-life stance? It is based entirely on the Christian bible and not fiscal conservatism. In 2010 Ryan wrote that I cannot believe any official or citizen can still defend the notion that an unborn human being has no rights and it explains his attempt at legislation granting personhood to a zygote. In fact, while Republicans were condemning Akin, Tony Perkins, president of the conservative Family Research Council (FRC) and staunch pro-life advocate stood by him and voiced their unwavering support. Perkins claimed the controversy was a gotcha political moment, and issued a stern warning to Republicans who considered criticizing Akin, and said the controversy was to divert attention from Akins Senate opponent Claire McCaskill. FRCs Action PAC president Connie Mackey issued a statement that We know who Todd Akin is. Hes a defender of life. Hes a defender of families and this is just a controversy built up, but like Ryan, Romney, and Republican Party, Akin is not a defender of families.
more: http://www.politicususa.com/legitimate-rape-tip-republican-war-women-iceberg.html
Lifelong Protester
(8,421 posts)run by a bunch of Bible-thumping males, looking to dominate women.
I hope everyone is doing all they can to help defeat all of these so-called defenders of life.
CanonRay
(14,104 posts)I do not see how Romney can win with these topics being the center of discussion.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)Bwhahahahahahah!
The worst campaigner in the history of US politics. He makes His Chimperial Highness look like frigging Pericles as an orator.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)It feels as though there's been a war against women's rights to own their own reproductive choices ever since.
Sure Roe v Wade ramped up the reproductive independence for women but I'd stipulate it was the birth control pill that really opened the door.
When are we in the US finally going to pass the point of no return, when its a commonly accepted societal norm that women get to have ownership of their reproductive choices? This fight has been going on for decades in this country. This isn't even an issue in vast swatches of the world but we're still duking it out here.
I can't wait for this issue to be about as controversial as a woman deciding to go to the dentist - eg its a medical procedure that's understood to be entirely the woman's choice, made between her and her health care provider ....
William769
(55,147 posts)Women are taking back control of both in many ways (as they should), and it's not sitting well with the men folk.
ProfessionalLeftist
(4,982 posts)taking/keeping women's control over their bodies and lives in men's hands. It's all about control.