Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

unblock

(52,253 posts)
Tue Aug 21, 2012, 01:40 PM Aug 2012

grammatically speaking, "forcible rape" isn't a name for a crime, it's a name for a tool.

it's "forced entry", not "forcible entry".
it's "aggravated assault", not "aggravatable(?) assault".
it's "armed robbery", not armable robbery".
it's "attempted murder", not "attemptable murder".

so on a purely grammatically level, it should be "forced rape", not "forcible rape".
that is, if the idea is to say that only violent violation a violation of the law.


"forcible rape" sounds more like a tool, something that might be found in a tool box next to "adjustable wire cutters" and a "flexible socket wrench".


am i right?
am i right?

hmm, i wonder what this says about ryan and akin and all the other gop co-sponsors of that bill....




1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
grammatically speaking, "forcible rape" isn't a name for a crime, it's a name for a tool. (Original Post) unblock Aug 2012 OP
You do have a point. Maybe they are just trying to appeal to their moranic base. MichaelSoE Aug 2012 #1
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»grammatically speaking, &...