General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMichigan--Obama (44) Romney (48)
Appears to be a questionable pollster though. It's getting a lot of play in Michigan.
http://www.myfoxdetroit.com/story/19329562/new-michigan-poll-has-romney-ahead-of-obama
RandySF
(58,935 posts)Proud liberal 80
(4,167 posts)Had Romney up in Florida yesterday 53 to 39 that is why TPM switched fla from toss up to leans Romney
ananda
(28,867 posts)That is so hard to believe.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)Celebrating again?
Aug. 20: When the Polling Gets Weird
http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/08/20/aug-20-when-the-polling-gets-weird/
I'm terrified of Obama losing.
Dont assume that because you deal with bad news differently that we're not on the same team.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"I'm terrified of Obama losing. "
...suggest stop searching for every crappy negative poll?
woolldog
(8,791 posts)I look here:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/
which has every poll. It's just that most of them have been crappy lately.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"I'm not 'searching for every crappy poll'"
...that way, especially since you only post the negative ones. Still why not do a little research so that you can gain some perspective?
"It's just that most of them have been crappy lately."
No they haven't been. Look here: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/mi/michigan_romney_vs_obama-1811.html
averages are lagging indicators
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"*sigh* averages are lagging indicators"
You said "most of them have been crappy lately," and relevant to Michigan, no they haven't.
You're not "terrified" Obama is going to lose, you're here pushing the point using flawed polls.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Chill out.
The polling methodology is a joke.
cali
(114,904 posts)snooper2
(30,151 posts)Will the Real Cali please stand up!
cali
(114,904 posts)do explain. Not that I expect you can or will. specifics would be nice.
And as far as this topic goes, I've said from the get go that Obama could lose.
snooper2
(30,151 posts)I meant you "cali" and "cali democrat" that you had responded to
sibelian
(7,804 posts)http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021158832
YES!!! YES!!!!
FEAR.......................
THE FEAR...........
AT LAST SOMEONE GETS IT!
woolldog
(8,791 posts)deeply disturbing.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)I hope it's temporary and an aberration.
Cicada
(4,533 posts)this is one wacky pollster. In their FL poll they estimate only 10% of electorate will be under 50 years old. In 2008 it was 50%. Silver calculates their MI house effect, compared to other pollsters, at plus 11 pro republican.
Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)Ikonoklast
(23,973 posts)Do you really think you are fooling anyone except yourself?
sibelian
(7,804 posts)progressivebydesign
(19,458 posts)spartan61
(2,091 posts)Proud liberal 80
(4,167 posts)Both Michigan and Florida
http://battlegroundwatch.com/2012/08/20/poll-shows-romney-up-huge-with-seniors-foster-mccollum-white-associates/
If anyone can come out with a poll and sample who they want then I just conducted a poll that had Obama up 90% to 10% in Texas and 100 to 0% in Georgia; according to my polls these states are now strongly Obama. The media needs to change the projection maps and highlight my polls.
In all seriousness, it seems like everytimea poll is very favorable to Obama like last weeks Fox and CNN polls, they are dismissed by the media and everything is still so close. But when poll is favoring Romney no matter the margin then Obama is I trouble,
woolldog
(8,791 posts)this pollster reweights data. that's always a big red flag to me and why I was arguing with Pro Sense in the WI thread.
PPP doesn't reweight data, yet she was criticizing them for their composition of the poll respondents.
this pollster reweights data. that's always a big red flag to me and why I was arguing with Pro Sense in the WI thread.
PPP doesn't reweight data, yet she was criticizing them for their composition of the poll respondents.
...your facts straight. I mentioned exactly why I see a flaw in the sample: http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=1172933
There is no way 66 percent of Wisconsin voters are going to be over 45.
On edit: In fact, the previous poll that showed Obama ahead, used a sample that included 62 percent over 45.
That is the difference oversampling seniors makes.
woolldog
(8,791 posts)there's no flaw. You just don't like the particular results.
That's like flipping a coin 100 times and being angry that it came up heads 46 times instead of 49, or 50 or however many times YOU think it should've come up. Get over it.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)could lead to a 16 point advantage for Democrats, and that would still be questionable.
Bottom line: The GE population will not be 66 percent over 45. Period.
NotThisTime
(3,657 posts)with these people?
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)We are in that part of the cycle where things will fluctuate a lot. Take a break from reading all the polls and just relax. Things will shake out in a month or so.
berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)Also, it was a robo-poll, very unreliable. Out of 41,552 calls, only 1733 participated.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)woolldog
(8,791 posts)Tarheel_Dem
(31,235 posts)I posted a good poll in Virginia, no replies. Like Pavlov's dog I'm being conditioned to only post bad news.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,235 posts)woolldog
(8,791 posts)I get all my polls from RCP.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/
I highly recommend you bookmark that page.
hay rick
(7,625 posts)WI_DEM
(33,497 posts)marmar
(77,084 posts)I cannot believe people fall for this shit.