Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Look, I am NOT saying Todd Akin supporters should eat shit and die. I'd never do that. (Original Post) LuckyTheDog Aug 2012 OP
Not only can it not be helped sibelian Aug 2012 #1
I said in an earlier post that they all can eat shit and I'd give 'em a spoon. nc4bo Aug 2012 #2
If it is unwanted shit, the body has ways to shut that whole thing down. Liberal Veteran Aug 2012 #3
But they have to die if it's legitimate shit, tho, right?? lastlib Aug 2012 #4
Wouldn't Todd Akin supporters eating shit be considered an act of rateyes Aug 2012 #5
hmm by golly I think you're right flamingdem Aug 2012 #7
This thread very quickly went off the rails! randome Aug 2012 #6
well, if it can't be helped AtomicKitten Aug 2012 #8

sibelian

(7,804 posts)
1. Not only can it not be helped
Tue Aug 21, 2012, 05:24 PM
Aug 2012

who are we to say whether they should have died or not? God moves in mysterious ways. If the shit is blessed by God perhaps they were meant to die.

nc4bo

(17,651 posts)
2. I said in an earlier post that they all can eat shit and I'd give 'em a spoon.
Tue Aug 21, 2012, 05:26 PM
Aug 2012

and hope they all choke on it.

The End.

lastlib

(23,251 posts)
4. But they have to die if it's legitimate shit, tho, right??
Tue Aug 21, 2012, 06:07 PM
Aug 2012

Is there a distinction from eating forcible shit?

I'm just trying to understand the nuances here.....

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Look, I am NOT saying Tod...