Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

redstatebluegirl

(12,265 posts)
Thu Jan 31, 2019, 03:41 PM Jan 2019

This morning I saw my pain management specialist.

I don't take pain meds daily, but there are days when just to get out of bed and function I need them. With the new laws in Oklahoma my doctor has tons of paperwork we have to fill out. I have to see her every 3 months for an appointment unrelated to my pain, she cannot manipulate my back or treat me with pressure point injections, just renew my meds.

I know people get hooked on opioids, but punishing patients with chronic pain isn't fair either. Plus what they are making doctors to do be compliant, my doctor is terrified of not being compliant. The amount of paperwork is mind boggling.

28 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This morning I saw my pain management specialist. (Original Post) redstatebluegirl Jan 2019 OP
might be time for a road trip to CO? 0rganism Jan 2019 #1
I do but relocating is not an option. redstatebluegirl Jan 2019 #2
then i sympathize threefold 0rganism Jan 2019 #3
We haven't had them in a while but they are possible so I have to be careful. redstatebluegirl Jan 2019 #6
I'm a bit confused. Ms. Toad Jan 2019 #4
Nope these are separate rules by Oklahoma. redstatebluegirl Jan 2019 #5
I just skimmed the law (as amended Nov 2018), and don't see a requirement that Ms. Toad Jan 2019 #7
Well I am being required to do it. redstatebluegirl Jan 2019 #8
Wow - Ms. Toad Jan 2019 #9
Thanks it makes me nuts. I am not responsible for the people who abuse these drugs. redstatebluegirl Jan 2019 #10
Same here - Ms. Toad Jan 2019 #13
I appreciate that you understand. redstatebluegirl Jan 2019 #16
And honestly...whether it is or isn't Horse with no Name Jan 2019 #23
Thanks it sucks. redstatebluegirl Jan 2019 #24
So sorry snowybirdie Jan 2019 #11
It is complicated, almost impossible regulations like this MineralMan Jan 2019 #12
The problem is, people have convinced the state legislators that they can fix this with legislation. redstatebluegirl Jan 2019 #14
Exactly. MineralMan Jan 2019 #27
At a significantly increased cost. Ms. Toad Jan 2019 #17
I don't know what hurts, but have you tried yoga? Claritie Pixie Jan 2019 #15
I have had two spinal fusions, yoga is not a option. redstatebluegirl Jan 2019 #18
Please reconsider yoga as an option, even with spinal fusion. Claritie Pixie Jan 2019 #19
I was told by my surgeon that this could damage my spine. redstatebluegirl Jan 2019 #21
I feel for you. Baitball Blogger Jan 2019 #20
I get that, but penalizing all of us for those few is a problem. redstatebluegirl Jan 2019 #22
I'm sure that everything is tied to this opiod crisis. Baitball Blogger Jan 2019 #25
But they don't need to make it impossible for those of us who need it to get it. redstatebluegirl Jan 2019 #26
I don't know the process well enough to determine if exemptions will undermine Baitball Blogger Jan 2019 #28

0rganism

(23,956 posts)
1. might be time for a road trip to CO?
Thu Jan 31, 2019, 03:44 PM
Jan 2019

maybe check if some of those "alternative treatments" available in Colorado have an effect worth relocating for, if you know what i mean.

redstatebluegirl

(12,265 posts)
2. I do but relocating is not an option.
Thu Jan 31, 2019, 03:45 PM
Jan 2019

Plus taking enough CBD oil to help me and I won't pass a urine test at my work.

0rganism

(23,956 posts)
3. then i sympathize threefold
Thu Jan 31, 2019, 03:50 PM
Jan 2019

first, for having chronic pain, difficult to treat through a process made more onerous by increasing restrictions on opioids
second, for being unable to live where your pain could receive less intrusive assistance
third, for having to deal with urine tests in your workplace

i really hope things turn around for you.

Ms. Toad

(34,074 posts)
4. I'm a bit confused.
Thu Jan 31, 2019, 03:52 PM
Jan 2019

You seem to be suggesting that the appointment for the pain prescription must be a separate appointment from other appointments to manipulate your back or treat you with pressure point injections.

I don't believe that is the case. The pain med laws are largely dictated by the feds - and off and on, I'm on them. They should be very similar everywhere. My appointments for medication that is governed by the same rule are always combined with other medical consultations.

(I agree with your general point - the imposition of face-to-face appointments every 3 months becasue some people on opioids are abusing the system is unconscionable. Just suggesting that if your doctor is insisting on separate appointments for medical care v. pain management that you push her a bit.)

redstatebluegirl

(12,265 posts)
5. Nope these are separate rules by Oklahoma.
Thu Jan 31, 2019, 03:57 PM
Jan 2019

I have to have two appointments every three months, one for the pain meds and one for manipulation. Sorry it is the law I checked to make sure. Oklahoma is special.

Ms. Toad

(34,074 posts)
7. I just skimmed the law (as amended Nov 2018), and don't see a requirement that
Thu Jan 31, 2019, 04:34 PM
Jan 2019

appointments for opioid prescriptions be limited solely to that end (unless the doctor you see for manipulation hasn't jumped through the hoops to prescribe pain meds - if you're seeing two docs, and only one can prescribe pain meds, you're out of luck).

Here's the relevant portion of the best practices guidance to physicians:

Chronic Pain Prescriptions: If continuing treatment for three months or more, practitioner shall: (1) review every three months the course of treatment, any new information regarding etiology of pain and progress toward treatment objectives; (2) assess patient prior to every renewal to determine if patient is experiencing dependency and document assessment; (3) periodically make reasonable efforts, unless clinically contraindicated to stop, decrease dosage or try other treatment modalities; (4) review PMP; (5) monitor compliance with pain management agreement. 63 O.S. §2-309I(F). *Assessment may be performed by a mid-level PA/APRN. Face-to-face assessment is recommended but not required.

...

Patient-Provider Agreement [Pain Management Agreement]: Practitioner shall enter into a Patient-Provider Agreement [Pain Management Agreement] with a patient: (1) at the time of the third prescription for opioid or Schedule II drug; (2) If patient requires more than three months of pain management; (3) if patient is prescribed benzodiazepines and opioids together; (4) if patient requires more than 100 mg morphine milligram equivalents (MME); (5) If patient is pregnant; or (6) with the parent or guardian if the patient is a minor. 63 O.S. §2-309I(I); 63 O.S. §2-309I(B)(6),(7)


Perhaps it is an office policy - or an insurance requirement? If the former is the case, you may be able to get around it by changing practitioners (not necessarily a happy option); if it is by the latter, you are stuck with insurance company rules.

Not meaning to be a pain - but you shouldn't be reqiured to pay for (and go to the trouble of having) two separate appointments, when it does not appear anything in the law prevents the opioid assessment and refill from being done in conjunction with other medical care.

I've been through this with the laws surrounding allergy meds and successfully beat back pharmacist imposed quantity limitations that they were blaming on either state or federal anti-meth laws. They were spouting nonsense and, once I brought the law to their attention (bringing a copy in to the pharmacy), the nonsense ended. I've also been through this insurance/office policy with a doctor who insisted that I pay $25/pop for a 3-5 weekly blood draws (essentially a finger prick) when my insurance covered them without additional charge if I went to a freestanding lab. I don't like people getting snookered by insurance or doctors who like to point the finger of blame elsewhere.

redstatebluegirl

(12,265 posts)
8. Well I am being required to do it.
Thu Jan 31, 2019, 04:36 PM
Jan 2019

And that appointment is not covered by my insurance, it is all me. I will ask them about it, but they said it was the law as they understood it.

Ms. Toad

(34,074 posts)
9. Wow -
Thu Jan 31, 2019, 04:46 PM
Jan 2019

I'd be checking with my insurance company. Since the appointment is required** for medical treatment, I don't see how insurance can get away with not paying for it.

**There is an asterisk in the snippets I posted that said a 90-day face-to-face assessment was not necessarily required - but I didn't track that reference any further since the face-to-face bit is pretty standard. I just went through the acute pain (spiral fracture in my tibia) 2-week checkup in Ohio. Fortunately, I didn't need a refill - but the law pretty much tracks OK law. You get one week (6-days, actually) then have to be seen before a second prescription can be issued.

But yours sounds like a combination of office policy and insurance. With my battle with office policy, I went through multiple outside labs before I could find one that could process the results same-day without additional charge. I was motivated because I wanted to keep the doctor - but ultimately, if my only option was to pay $75 - $125 a week - I'd have found a new one. But that's not an easy decision.

best of luck. I've been railing against these artificially imposed pain management requirements since they started being imposed as a financial and physical tax on people who already have way too much on their plates.

redstatebluegirl

(12,265 posts)
10. Thanks it makes me nuts. I am not responsible for the people who abuse these drugs.
Thu Jan 31, 2019, 04:48 PM
Jan 2019

They help me when I need it, I don't abuse them.

Ms. Toad

(34,074 posts)
13. Same here -
Thu Jan 31, 2019, 04:59 PM
Jan 2019

I have chronic pain (but not at the level I need opioids for). But periodically I need them to manage acute pain - when I get them, I use them judiciously and hoard whatever is left. I strung 22 pills out over 11 days this time.

Unfortunately, as they get stingier - I have fewer left (only 2 this time), and I used most of my hoarded stash up on rotator cuff pain over the last several months (some of which were a decade old). That makes me nervous. I have a spouse with chronic kidney stones. Our only alternative for that excruciating pain is (1) hoarded pills or (2) a $100 trip to the ER, since the first visit with her urologist is generally 2-3 weeks out.

Like you - I don't abuse them. When prescribed, I generally use fewer than permitted (e.g. 2/day, instead of 4/day). When I take them on my own - it is very rare - and only for acute pain that is too intense for OTC pain meds - and generally in consultation with a doctor to keep me comfortable until an appointment is available.

The impact on me is relatively minimal (no way to build up a new stash for emergencies) - I can't imaging having to go through this every three months (cost, physical imposition, and being treated as someone who abuses drugs - i.e. random pill counts & blood tests)

redstatebluegirl

(12,265 posts)
16. I appreciate that you understand.
Thu Jan 31, 2019, 05:02 PM
Jan 2019

Please take care of yourself. We are all going to end up on the black market before long so someone doesn't abuse them.

Horse with no Name

(33,956 posts)
23. And honestly...whether it is or isn't
Thu Jan 31, 2019, 05:11 PM
Jan 2019

It is their understanding of it and their office policy made by that understanding that will dictate what you can and can’t do.
I totally get it. I work for a large hospital system and deal with chronic pain sufferers. We are at the mercy of those hired to interpret the laws and institute policy.
My interpretation is different but that doesn’t matter.
I have to enforce the rules that they make.
Good luck to you.

snowybirdie

(5,229 posts)
11. So sorry
Thu Jan 31, 2019, 04:56 PM
Jan 2019

Living with chronic pain is awful. Hopefully, more sensible rules on cannabis will become law soon! Good luck

MineralMan

(146,317 posts)
12. It is complicated, almost impossible regulations like this
Thu Jan 31, 2019, 04:56 PM
Jan 2019

that are powering the black market in opioids. Very many people simply obtain the meds they need through other channels.

I'm not recommending that, but it's what's going on out there.

We need a much better system, but there is so much profit to be found outside of the usual channels that there may be a tie from that to the increased regulations. I don't know, but...

redstatebluegirl

(12,265 posts)
14. The problem is, people have convinced the state legislators that they can fix this with legislation.
Thu Jan 31, 2019, 05:00 PM
Jan 2019

You will never stop people from misusing drugs. My problem is penalizing those of us who need them off and on or on a daily basis to survive. Help the addiction, not by making me be in pain 24/7.

Ms. Toad

(34,074 posts)
17. At a significantly increased cost.
Thu Jan 31, 2019, 05:03 PM
Jan 2019

I just filled an oxycodone prescription plus two others for under $5. Street value of my oxy prescription - $120

Claritie Pixie

(2,199 posts)
15. I don't know what hurts, but have you tried yoga?
Thu Jan 31, 2019, 05:01 PM
Jan 2019

I was suffering from chronic pain after a car accident. Yoga saved my life.

Claritie Pixie

(2,199 posts)
19. Please reconsider yoga as an option, even with spinal fusion.
Thu Jan 31, 2019, 05:06 PM
Jan 2019

“The goal is not to get around your spinal fusion — that’s fixed,” Ms. Rosetti told me. “The goal is figuring out how to support it. The goal is comfort and longevity.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/28/nyregion/yoga-classes-even-with-a-fused-spine.html

redstatebluegirl

(12,265 posts)
21. I was told by my surgeon that this could damage my spine.
Thu Jan 31, 2019, 05:08 PM
Jan 2019

I have spondylolythesis which means my spine moves out of position.

Baitball Blogger

(46,731 posts)
20. I feel for you.
Thu Jan 31, 2019, 05:07 PM
Jan 2019

On the other hand, there are irresponsible doctors who need to be watched because they are prescribing medication that they themselves use and what's a better way to retain a patient than to get them addicted to a prescription? Worse, they might have a policy of delegating patients to their Physician Assistants who are prescribing medication that should be reserved for M.D.s to diagnose.

redstatebluegirl

(12,265 posts)
22. I get that, but penalizing all of us for those few is a problem.
Thu Jan 31, 2019, 05:09 PM
Jan 2019

A person who has an addiction problem, will move on to another drug when this one is not available.

Baitball Blogger

(46,731 posts)
25. I'm sure that everything is tied to this opiod crisis.
Thu Jan 31, 2019, 05:14 PM
Jan 2019

They are probably trying to follow the plumes to the source of the problems. Also, don't ignore how they're keeping track of the patients, making sure that addicts aren't the ones creating their own problems by visiting various doctors. With digital records, it's not difficult to follow. But there you go. Someone has to force the paper trail.

Baitball Blogger

(46,731 posts)
28. I don't know the process well enough to determine if exemptions will undermine
Thu Jan 31, 2019, 05:34 PM
Jan 2019

the results. I wish i could be more supportive, besides saying that I feel for you.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This morning I saw my pai...